The EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire for cancer patients ( QLQ ‐C30): Australian general population reference values

生活质量(医疗保健) 人口 医学 规范性 苦恼 老年学 人口学 物理疗法 临床心理学 环境卫生 认识论 哲学 社会学 护理部
作者
Rebecca Mercieca‐Bebber,Daniel Costa,Richard Norman,Monika Janda,David P. Smith,Peter Grimison,Eva‐Maria Gamper,Madeleine King
出处
期刊:The Medical Journal of Australia [Wiley]
卷期号:210 (11): 499-506 被引量:37
标识
DOI:10.5694/mja2.50207
摘要

Objectives To generate Australian general population reference values for the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire for cancer patients (QLQ-C30); to compare Australian values with published EORTC general population reference values, and to explore associations between socio-demographic and health characteristics and QLQ-C30 subscale scores. Design Analysis of responses to cross-sectional, online survey (QLQ-C30), March 2015 – February 2016, and supplementary health-related and socio-demographic questions. Setting, participants 1979 people quota-sampled from a national online survey panel to be representative of the Australian general population by age and sex. Main outcome measures Mean QLQ-C30 subscale scores, adjusted for socio-demographic characteristics and comorbid conditions, by sex and age group. Results Data for 1821 participants were analysed (92% completion rate); 924 (50.7%) were women. Higher psychological distress was associated with worse outcomes on all QLQ-C30 subscales. Better self-reported general health was associated with better global quality of life and better functioning (except cognitive functioning), and less fatigue, pain, dyspnoea and insomnia. Having arthritis or rheumatism was associated with poorer global quality of life, and poorer physical, role and social functioning, and with more fatigue, pain, insomnia, diarrhoea, and financial difficulties. Although differences between Australian QLQ-C30 subscale scores and EORTC general population values were clinically trivial, the Australian values are more accurate benchmarks for QLQ-C30 results from Australians with cancer. Conclusions Our Australian QLQ-C30 reference values provide normative benchmarks that facilitate interpretation of data for Australians with cancer in terms of burden of disease and its treatment. In survivorship studies and studies without pre-disease baseline data, comparisons with reference values can indicate the extent to which people have returned to better levels of health.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
iota发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
刚刚
Polca完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
科目三应助动听的薯片采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
ChatGPT发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
墨染书香发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
3秒前
鲤鱼如容完成签到,获得积分20
5秒前
6秒前
情怀应助自然傲柔采纳,获得10
8秒前
Lucifer发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
Wasea发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
左岸心诚发布了新的文献求助20
10秒前
11秒前
12秒前
12秒前
15秒前
紫金大萝卜应助oldfive采纳,获得10
15秒前
kkk完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
博洋发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
茁壮成长的兰顺完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
欣慰汉堡发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
Mo_Hog发布了新的文献求助20
17秒前
激动的花生完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
脑洞疼应助小羊的yang是阳采纳,获得10
18秒前
Owen应助圈圈采纳,获得10
18秒前
含蓄越彬完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
萌123发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
奋斗的绝悟完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
23秒前
24秒前
单纯的奇异果完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
萌123完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
鲤鱼如容关注了科研通微信公众号
27秒前
28秒前
完美世界应助美好的含蕊采纳,获得10
29秒前
Ava应助纯真以晴采纳,获得10
30秒前
30秒前
lax完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
高分求助中
Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 4 Volume Set (ASM Books) 13th Edition 1000
Sport in der Antike 800
De arte gymnastica. The art of gymnastics 600
Berns Ziesemer - Maos deutscher Topagent: Wie China die Bundesrepublik eroberte 500
Stephen R. Mackinnon - Chen Hansheng: China’s Last Romantic Revolutionary (2023) 500
Sport in der Antike Hardcover – March 1, 2015 500
Boris Pesce - Gli impiegati della Fiat dal 1955 al 1999 un percorso nella memoria 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 有机化学 工程类 生物化学 纳米技术 物理 内科学 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 电极 光电子学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 2423211
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2111984
关于积分的说明 5348068
捐赠科研通 1839497
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 915686
版权声明 561258
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 489747