医学
除颤
生存链
系统回顾
气道
心肺复苏术
复苏
重症监护医学
气道阻塞
基本生命支持
急诊医学
医疗急救
高级生命支持
紧急医疗服务
梅德林
麻醉
心脏病学
法学
政治学
作者
Theresa M. Olasveengen,Mary E. Mancini,Gavin D. Perkins,Suzanne R Avis,Steven C. Brooks,Maaret Castrén,Sung Phil Chung,Julie Considine,Keith Couper,Raffo Escalante,Tetsuo Hatanaka,Kevin Kei Ching Hung,Peter J. Kudenchuk,Swee Han Lim,Chika Nishiyama,Giuseppe Ristagno,Federico Semeraro,C. F. C. Smith,Michael A. Smyth,Christian Vaillancourt,Jerry P. Nolan,Mary Fran Hazinski,Peter Morley,NULL AUTHOR_ID
出处
期刊:Circulation
[Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
日期:2020-10-20
卷期号:142 (16_suppl_1)
被引量:92
标识
DOI:10.1161/cir.0000000000000892
摘要
This 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations on basic life support summarizes evidence evaluations performed for 22 topics that were prioritized by the Basic Life Support Task Force of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. The evidence reviews include 16 systematic reviews, 5 scoping reviews, and 1 evidence update. Per agreement within the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation, new or revised treatment recommendations were only made after a systematic review. Systematic reviews were performed for the following topics: dispatch diagnosis of cardiac arrest, use of a firm surface for CPR, sequence for starting CPR (compressions-airway-breaths versus airway-breaths-compressions), CPR before calling for help, duration of CPR cycles, hand position during compressions, rhythm check timing, feedback for CPR quality, alternative techniques, public access automated external defibrillator programs, analysis of rhythm during chest compressions, CPR before defibrillation, removal of foreign-body airway obstruction, resuscitation care for suspected opioid-associated emergencies, drowning, and harm from CPR to victims not in cardiac arrest. The topics that resulted in the most extensive task force discussions included CPR during transport, CPR before calling for help, resuscitation care for suspected opioid-associated emergencies, feedback for CPR quality, and analysis of rhythm during chest compressions. After discussion of the scoping reviews and the evidence update, the task force prioritized several topics for new systematic reviews.