Review—A Comparative Analysis of the Fundamental Characteristics and Uses of the Amorphous Polymers Poly(sulfone) and Poly(methyl methacrylate)

Abstract Amorphous polymers have some limitations compared to their crystalline counterparts but also several advantages, such as improved transparency, ease of processing, and specific applications in industries where their unique properties are beneficial. The choice between amorphous and crystalline polymers depends on the specific requirements of the application and desired material properties. In this regard, Poly (sulfone) (PSF) and Poly (methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) offer a range of valuable properties that can be beneficial in various applications. Their unique characteristics make them stand out among other amorphous polymers and contribute to their popularity in different industries. PSF and PMMA are two distinct types of amorphous polymers that possess different chemical structures and properties, leading to varied applications. PSF is preferred when high temperature and chemical resistance are crucial, while PMMA is ideal for applications that require excellent optical clarity and transparency. Both polymers have their strengths and weaknesses, and their uses depend on specific requirements in different industries. This review aims to present a comparative analysis of the fundamental characteristics like physical, chemical, thermal, and mechanical properties of PSF and PMMA and their uses. This article also provides a valuable reference for comprehending the two polymers for progress in numerous science and technology domains