政治
实证经济学
冲突解决研究
政治学
社会心理学
政治经济学
探索者
动机推理
利益冲突
社会学
经济
冲突解决
心理学
法学
作者
Eric Groenendyk,Yanna Krupnikov,John Barry Ryan,Elizabeth C. Connors
标识
DOI:10.1017/s0003055423001417
摘要
In recent decades, the term “politics” has become almost synonymous with conflict. Results from eight studies show that individuals averse to conflict tend to select out of surveys and discussions explicitly labeled as “political.” This suggests that the inferences researchers draw from “political” surveys, as well as the impressions average Americans draw from explicitly “political” discussions, will be systematically biased toward conflict. We find little evidence that these effects can be attenuated by emphasizing deliberative norms. However, conflict averse individuals are more willing to discuss ostensibly political topics such as the economy, climate change, and racial inequality, despite reluctance to discuss “politics” explicitly. Moreover, they express greater interest in politics when it is defined in terms of laws and policies and debate is deemphasized. Overall, these findings suggest the expectation of conflict may have a self-fulfilling effect, as contexts deemed explicitly “political” will be composed primarily of conflict seekers.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI