基因组
大型底栖动物
DNA条形码
生物
纳米孔测序
DNA测序
环境DNA
计算生物学
生物多样性
细胞色素c氧化酶亚单位Ⅰ
霰弹枪测序
生态学
Illumina染料测序
进化生物学
线粒体DNA
丰度(生态学)
遗传学
DNA
基因
作者
Karlijn Doorenspleet,Amalia A. Mailli,Berry B. van der Hoorn,Kevin K. Beentjes,Annelies De Backer,Sofie Derycke,Albertinka J. Murk,Henning Reiss,Reindert Nijland
出处
期刊:PeerJ
[PeerJ]
日期:2025-04-14
卷期号:13: e19158-e19158
被引量:3
摘要
DNA-based methods and developments of sequencing technologies are integral to macrobenthos biodiversity studies, and their implementation as standardized monitoring methods is approaching. Evaluating the efficacy and reliability of these technological developments is crucial for macrobenthos biodiversity assessments. In this study, we compared three DNA-based techniques for assessing the diversity of bulk macrobenthos samples from the Belgian North Sea. Specifically, we compared amplicon sequencing using Illumina MiSeq and portable real-time sequencing of Oxford Nanopore versus shotgun sequencing using Illumina NovaSeq sequencing. The 313 bp mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) metabarcoding fragment served as the target region for the metabarcoding analysis. Our results indicate that Oxford Nanopore and MiSeq metabarcoding had similar performances in terms of alpha and beta diversity, revealing highly similar location-specific community compositions. The NovaSeq metagenomics method also resulted in similar alpha diversity, but slightly different community compositions compared to the metabarcoding approach. Despite these differences, location-specific community compositions were maintained across all platforms. Notably, read counts from the NovaSeq metagenomic analysis showed the weakest correlation to size corrected morphological abundance and there were mismatches between morphological identification and all DNA based findings which are likely caused by a combination of factors such as primer efficiency and an incomplete reference database. Our findings underscore the critical importance of database completeness prior to implementing DNA-based techniques as standardized monitoring method, especially for metagenomics. Nevertheless, our findings emphasize that Oxford Nanopore metabarcoding proves to be a viable alternative to the conventional Illumina MiSeq metabarcoding platform for macrobenthos biodiversity monitoring.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI