A smoking cessation smartphone app that delivers real-time ‘context aware’ behavioural support: the Quit Sense feasibility RCT

随机对照试验 戒烟 背景(考古学) 医学 介绍 心理干预 物理疗法 心理学 家庭医学 护理部 生物 外科 病理 古生物学
作者
Felix Naughton,Aimie Hope,Chloë Brown,Kelly Grant,Caitlin Notley,Antony Colles,Claire West,Cecilia Mascolo,Tim Coleman,Garry Barton,Lee Shepstone,A Toby Prevost,Stephen Sutton,David Crane,Felix Greaves,Juliet High
出处
期刊:Public health research [NIHR Journals Library]
卷期号:: 1-99 被引量:5
标识
DOI:10.3310/kqyt5412
摘要

Background During a quit attempt, cues from a smoker’s environment are a major cause of brief smoking lapses, which increase the risk of relapse. Quit Sense is a theory-guided Just-In-Time Adaptive Intervention smartphone app, providing smokers with the means to learn about their environmental smoking cues and provides ‘in the moment’ support to help them manage these during a quit attempt. Objective To undertake a feasibility randomised controlled trial to estimate key parameters to inform a definitive randomised controlled trial of Quit Sense. Design A parallel, two-arm randomised controlled trial with a qualitative process evaluation and a ‘Study Within A Trial’ evaluating incentives on attrition. The research team were blind to allocation except for the study statistician, database developers and lead researcher. Participants were not blind to allocation. Setting Online with recruitment, enrolment, randomisation and data collection (excluding manual telephone follow-up) automated through the study website. Participants Smokers (323 screened, 297 eligible, 209 enrolled) recruited via online adverts on Google search, Facebook and Instagram. Interventions Participants were allocated to ‘usual care’ arm ( n = 105; text message referral to the National Health Service SmokeFree website) or ‘usual care’ plus Quit Sense ( n = 104), via a text message invitation to install the Quit Sense app. Main outcome measures Follow-up at 6 weeks and 6 months post enrolment was undertaken by automated text messages with an online questionnaire link and, for non-responders, by telephone. Definitive trial progression criteria were met if a priori thresholds were included in or lower than the 95% confidence interval of the estimate. Measures included health economic and outcome data completion rates (progression criterion #1 threshold: ≥ 70%), including biochemical validation rates (progression criterion #2 threshold: ≥ 70%), recruitment costs, app installation (progression criterion #3 threshold: ≥ 70%) and engagement rates (progression criterion #4 threshold: ≥ 60%), biochemically verified 6-month abstinence and hypothesised mechanisms of action and participant views of the app (qualitative). Results Self-reported smoking outcome completion rates were 77% (95% confidence interval 71% to 82%) and health economic data (resource use and quality of life) 70% (95% CI 64% to 77%) at 6 months. Return rate of viable saliva samples for abstinence verification was 39% (95% CI 24% to 54%). The per-participant recruitment cost was £19.20, which included advert (£5.82) and running costs (£13.38). In the Quit Sense arm, 75% (95% CI 67% to 83%; 78/104) installed the app and, of these, 100% set a quit date within the app and 51% engaged with it for more than 1 week. The rate of 6-month biochemically verified sustained abstinence, which we anticipated would be used as a primary outcome in a future study, was 11.5% (12/104) in the Quit Sense arm and 2.9% (3/105) in the usual care arm (estimated effect size: adjusted odds ratio = 4.57, 95% CIs 1.23 to 16.94). There was no evidence of between-arm differences in hypothesised mechanisms of action. Three out of four progression criteria were met. The Study Within A Trial analysis found a £20 versus £10 incentive did not significantly increase follow-up rates though reduced the need for manual follow-up and increased response speed. The process evaluation identified several potential pathways to abstinence for Quit Sense, factors which led to disengagement with the app, and app improvement suggestions. Limitations Biochemical validation rates were lower than anticipated and imbalanced between arms. COVID-19-related restrictions likely limited opportunities for Quit Sense to provide location tailored support. Conclusions The trial design and procedures demonstrated feasibility and evidence was generated supporting the efficacy potential of Quit Sense. Future work Progression to a definitive trial is warranted providing improved biochemical validation rates. Trial registration This trial is registered as ISRCTN12326962. Funding This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Public Health Research programme (NIHR award ref: 17/92/31) and is published in full in Public Health Research ; Vol. 12, No. 4. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
刚刚
刚刚
刚刚
zhoushishan发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
李健应助小城楠采纳,获得10
1秒前
aaa关注了科研通微信公众号
2秒前
小目标完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
丘比特应助康哥采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
kkkkkkk发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
云染发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
5秒前
小希完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
小巧风华发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
小张完成签到,获得积分20
6秒前
拓拓发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
taotao发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
SciGPT应助accept白采纳,获得10
7秒前
科研通AI6.4应助元2333采纳,获得10
8秒前
张浩敏发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
9秒前
lu完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
广东下不了一点雪完成签到,获得积分20
10秒前
sakura发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
Kao应助霖昭采纳,获得10
10秒前
落后若山完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
stone完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
12秒前
ming2026应助雨小葵采纳,获得20
12秒前
XiaoxianSu完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
15秒前
dipper完成签到,获得积分20
15秒前
欣喜书兰应助sunxb10采纳,获得20
15秒前
aze完成签到,获得积分20
17秒前
康哥发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
Ver_Lec完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
17秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Les chinois de jakarta: temples et vie collective 1000
Autoparametric Resonance in Mechanical Systems 1000
Social Psychology 800
基于锂离子电池正极材料回收的绿色溶剂开发及工程化应用研究 800
Cosmos as Art Object: Studies in Plato's Timaeus and Other Dialogues 600
Management and the Arts 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7647140
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9219457
关于积分的说明 19785867
捐赠科研通 7212118
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3277273
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2438714
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2275633