Assessment of Electrical Impedance Tomography to Set Optimal Positive End-Expiratory Pressure for Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation-Treated Patients*

OBJECTIVES: Patients on venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation have many risk factors for pulmonary complications in addition to their heart failure. Optimal positive end-expiratory pressure is unknown in these patients. The aim was to evaluate the ability of electrical impedance tomography to help the physician to select the optimal positive end-expiratory pressure in venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation treated and mechanically ventilated patients during a positive end-expiratory pressure trial. DESIGN: Observational prospective monocentric. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: Patients ( n = 23) older than 18 years old, on mechanical ventilation and venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. INTERVENTIONS: A decreasing positive end-expiratory pressure trial (20–5 cm H 2 O) in increments of 5 cm H 2 O was performed and monitored by a collection of clinical parameters, ventilatory and ultrasonographic (cardiac and pulmonary) to define an optimal positive end-expiratory pressure according to respiratory criteria (optimal positive end-expiratory pressure selected by physician with respiratory parameters), and then adjusted according to hemodynamic and cardiac tolerances (optimal positive end-expiratory pressure selected by physician with respiratory, hemodynamic, and echocardiographic parameters). At the same time, electrical impedance tomography data (regional distribution of ventilation, compliance, and overdistension collapse) were recorded and analyzed retrospectively to define the optimal positive end-expiratory pressure. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The median of this optimal positive end-expiratory pressure was 10 cm H 2 O in our population. Electrical impedance tomography showed that increasing positive end-expiratory pressure promoted overdistention of ventral lung, maximum at positive end-expiratory pressure 20 cm H20 (34% [interquartile range, 24.5–40]). Decreasing positive end-expiratory pressure resulted in collapse of dorsal lung (29% [interquartile range, 21–45.8]). The optimal positive end-expiratory pressure selected by physician with respiratory parameters was not different from the positive end-expiratory pressure chosen by the electrical impedance tomography. However, there is a negative impact of a high level of intrathoracic pressure on hemodynamic and cardiac tolerances. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support that electrical impedance tomography appears predictive to define optimal positive end-expiratory pressure on venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, aided by echocardiography to optimize hemodynamic assessment and management.