医学
置信区间
超声波
可靠性(半导体)
协议限制
神经重症监护
放射科
协议(科学)
核医学
麻醉
内科学
病理
功率(物理)
物理
替代医学
量子力学
作者
Jakob Pansell,Max Bell,Peter Rudberg,Ola Friman,Charith Cooray
摘要
Abstract Background and Purpose Treatment of elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) is central to neurocritical care, but not all patients are eligible for invasive ICP‐monitoring. A promising noninvasive option is ultrasound measurement of the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD). However, meta‐analyses of ONSD for elevated ICP show wide confidence intervals. This might be due to baseline variations, inter‐rater variability, and varying measurement methods. No standardized protocol has been validated. Corrections for eyeball diameter (ED) and optic nerve diameter (OND) may compensate for baseline variations. We evaluated a protocol and compared two different measurement methods for ONSD ultrasound. Methods Two operators, blinded to each other's measurements, measured ONSD, ED, and OND twice in 20 patients. ONSD was measured with two different methods in use: internal (ONSDint) or external (ONSDext) of the dura mater. Intra‐class correlation (ICC) was calculated for inter‐rater and intra‐rater reliability. Results ICCs for inter‐rater reliability of ONSDext and ONSDint (95% confidence interval) were 0.96 (0.93, 0.98) and 0.88 (0.79, 0.94), respectively. ICCs for intra‐rater reliability of ONSDext and ONSDint were 0.97 (0.94, 0.99) and 0.93 (0.87, 0.96), respectively. There was no significant bias or difference in intra‐rater reliability between operators. Conclusions ONSD can be measured with an excellent inter‐ and intra‐rater reliability and low risk of inter‐rater bias, when using this protocol. ONSDext yields a higher inter‐ and intra‐rater reliability than ONSDint. Corrections for ED and OND can be performed reliably.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI