亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整的填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Drawing Boundaries: The Difficulty in Defining Clinical Reasoning

概念化 类比 构造(python库) 心理学 演绎推理 管理科学 认识论 认知科学 计算机科学 人工智能 哲学 经济 程序设计语言
作者
Meredith Young,Aliki Thomas,Stuart Lubarsky,Tiffany N.S. Ballard,David L. Gordon,Larry D. Gruppen,Eric S. Holmboe,Temple Ratcliffe,Joseph Rencic,Lambert Schuwirth,Steven J. Durning
出处
期刊:Academic Medicine [Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
卷期号:93 (7): 990-995 被引量:82
标识
DOI:10.1097/acm.0000000000002142
摘要

Clinical reasoning is an essential component of a health professional’s practice. Yet clinical reasoning research has produced a notably fragmented body of literature. In this article, the authors describe the pause-and-reflect exercise they undertook during the execution of a synthesis of the literature on clinical reasoning in the health professions. Confronted with the challenge of establishing a shared understanding of the nature and relevant components of clinical reasoning, members of the review team paused to independently generate their own personal definitions and conceptualizations of the construct. Here, the authors describe the variability of definitions and conceptualizations of clinical reasoning present within their own team. Drawing on an analogy from mathematics, they hypothesize that the presence of differing “boundary conditions” could help explain individuals’ differing conceptualizations of clinical reasoning and the fragmentation at play in the wider sphere of research on clinical reasoning. Specifically, boundary conditions refer to the practice of describing the conditions under which a given theory is expected to hold, or expected to have explanatory power. Given multiple theoretical frameworks, research methodologies, and assessment approaches contained within the clinical reasoning literature, different boundary conditions are likely at play. Open acknowledgment of different boundary conditions and explicit description of the conceptualization of clinical reasoning being adopted within a given study would improve research communication, support comprehensive approaches to teaching and assessing clinical reasoning, and perhaps encourage new collaborative partnerships among researchers who adopt different boundary conditions.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
小飞鼠发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
我要毕业完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
Sandy完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
啊啊啊啊完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
遇more完成签到 ,获得积分10
27秒前
迷你的从蕾完成签到 ,获得积分10
29秒前
英勇曼柔完成签到 ,获得积分10
35秒前
46秒前
李爱国应助佳佳采纳,获得10
46秒前
50秒前
56秒前
佳佳发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
热爱科研的人完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
万能图书馆应助Jiayou Zhang采纳,获得10
1分钟前
奥特超曼完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
Jiayou Zhang发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
phuocnlh完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
你好完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
cctv18应助迷你的从蕾采纳,获得30
1分钟前
1分钟前
Jiayou Zhang完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
无限亦寒完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
Sun发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
美美发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
研友_VZG7GZ应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
CharlotteBlue应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
1分钟前
1分钟前
Ji完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
碳酸芙兰完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
打不败的库洛完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
好学者完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
qiangxu发布了新的文献求助30
2分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
黄花菜完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
木有完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
CATH完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
高分求助中
Teaching Social and Emotional Learning in Physical Education 900
Plesiosaur extinction cycles; events that mark the beginning, middle and end of the Cretaceous 500
Two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis reveals causal relationships between blood lipids and venous thromboembolism 500
Chinese-English Translation Lexicon Version 3.0 500
[Lambert-Eaton syndrome without calcium channel autoantibodies] 440
薩提亞模式團體方案對青年情侶輔導效果之研究 400
3X3 Basketball: Everything You Need to Know 310
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 有机化学 工程类 生物化学 纳米技术 物理 内科学 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 电极 光电子学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 2387403
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2093900
关于积分的说明 5269844
捐赠科研通 1820649
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 908186
版权声明 559248
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 485150