医学
狭窄
一致性
心脏病学
冠状动脉疾病
内科学
放射科
优势比
冠状动脉
置信区间
心绞痛
血运重建
计算机断层血管造影
血管造影
逻辑回归
动脉
心肌梗塞
作者
Choongki Kim,Sung‐Jin Hong,Sanghoon Shin,Chul‐Min Ahn,Jung‐Sun Kim,Byeong‐Keuk Kim,Young‐Guk Ko,Byoung Wook Choi,Donghoon Choi,Yangsoo Jang,Myeong‐Ki Hong
标识
DOI:10.1097/mca.0000000000000750
摘要
We purposed to evaluate the reliability of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in patients with a CCTA finding of high-grade stenosis.Between May 2015 and March 2017, patients who underwent invasive coronary angiography (ICA) because of detection of high-grade stenosis by CCTA ( ≥ 70% stenosis of epicardial arteries or ≥ 50% of the left main coronary artery; Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System grade 4 or 5) were selected for this study from our prospective registry cohort.Among 646 eligible patients, only 263 (41%) patients were correctly diagnosed with significant coronary artery disease on ICA as same as CCTA findings. The per-vessel analysis revealed that 620 (68%) of 916 affected vessels had confirmed concordant significant stenosis between the CCTA and ICA results. The concordance rate was 49% among the segments with identified plaques in the per-segment analysis. Revascularization of the target vessel identified with severe stenosis by CCTA was performed in 228 (35%) patients. A logistic regression analysis revealed that smoking [odds ratio (OR): 1.59, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.04-2.42, P = 0.03], taller height (OR: 1.02, 95% CI: 1.00-1.05, P = 0.016), and presence of typical symptoms of angina (OR: 1.86, 95% CI: 1.34-2.59, P < 0.001) were found to increase the probability of diagnostic concordance. A greater calcified segment involvement score (OR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.82-0.94, P < 0.001) was associated with a lower diagnostic concordance.The diagnostic discordance between CCTA and ICA was frequently observed in patients who were diagnosed with a CCTA finding of high-grade stenosis.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI