Combating urgency culture in nursing leadership

管理层 心理学 倦怠 护理部 医学 焦虑 精神科 临床心理学
作者
Peter Stoffan
出处
期刊:Nursing Management [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:55 (9): 47-48
标识
DOI:10.1097/nmg.0000000000000164
摘要

FigureThere's a time and place for urgency, but it shouldn't be all the time and in every place. As nurses, we must maintain hypervigilance to deliver the reliable, quality, and safe patient care expected of our discipline. This hypervigilance may manifest as urgency, especially in the clinical setting. But what about outside the clinical setting? I know nurse leaders and academic colleagues who've received emails from team members or students late at night about nonurgent requests such as future schedule changes or questions that require thought, research, and follow-up. These same colleagues then received a second email the following morning (fewer than 12 hours later) from the same team member or student, looking for an immediate answer. This is unrealistic and unnecessary. Although positions in nursing, nursing leadership, and academia may commonly require 24/7 responsibility, time for sleep and recharging is critical in order to give considered responses to nonemergency demands for attention. So, what's the reasonable response in these scenarios? Fight or flight I read a great National Geographic article on the topic of urgency culture, and it triggered this line of thought.1 The author, Noma Nazish, explores the issues of burnout, always being "on," overstimulation, and unrealistic/unspoken expectations.1 Nazish connected with David Rabin, a neuroscientist and the CEO of Apollo Neuro, and highlights in the article that an overactive fight-or-flight response leads to poor health outcomes.1 This aligns with findings of poor health outcomes in nurses.2,3 It's a global paradoxical phenomenon that nurses are among the unhealthiest people in the US. Nurses are more likely to be overweight, have higher levels of stress, and get less than the recommended hours of sleep.2 Nurse leaders both within and outside the clinical setting face the temptation to "fight" the constant questioning or questioners or ignore noncritical demands (the "flight" response). How can nurse leaders triage the need to respond and then appropriately engage when immediacy is necessary? I would argue that immediate action is necessary less often than most of us think. Seeking middle ground I'm writing this as a nurse leader and a Magnet® Program Director; deadlines are critical and essential to maintaining progress in the Magnet journey to "nursing excellence." If any colleagues are reading this, of course I'm still expecting immediate replies to my emails and requests with absolutely no delays. (I'm mostly joking, colleagues!) But honestly, what are realistic and appropriate expectations for staff communications to maintain professionalism and respect for any realm outside the clinical setting? In other words, how can we be successful and respectful nurse leaders while surviving as healthy humans in a culture that's increasingly racing and rushed? Is there a middle ground? Other articles I've written have explored the need for self-care to improve health risks and enhance healthy behaviors in nurses and nurse leaders. It never dawned on me to explore how our culture impacts our overall health. So, how can we appropriately differentiate our response behaviors regarding urgent and nonurgent requests for information, including how we place demands on others and deal with those placing demands on us? The National Geographic article has some good ideas that are synergistic with the literature for improving nurse health and the advice given to us by our many mentors and colleagues. Although they aren't groundbreaking takeaways, these are good reminders for all of us. Pause and reflect. Take time to assess the scenario or request before responding. The email or text you're reading may seem urgent, but it may be a tonal issue. Perhaps we're the ones turning on our fight-or-flight response for no reason. Prioritize self. Practice mindfulness when you can, whatever this means to you personally. There's no one-size-fits-all approach to self-care, so do what works best for you. Set boundaries. Be clear in your communications. It may be okay to tell your leaders and colleagues that you don't have the capacity for a certain task now but be sure to let them know why and when they can expect an appropriate follow-up. It's also okay to sleep and wait to respond to an email once you're rested. Manage time. Block time to ensure you're managing your workload appropriately. I love using the calendar to map out my daily to-do list! Sometimes it works, and sometimes I'm less successful, but at least I start with a plan for each day. Continue the conversation I don't know what the happy medium is between overreacting and "checking out," but I do know that not all demands on leaders and staff are urgent. Some initiatives and tasks require urgency, and some don't. I believe that the more we discuss how to exist successfully in an urgency culture as a discipline, the better we'll all be.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
1秒前
飞行的子弹完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
3秒前
Akim应助天道轮回采纳,获得10
5秒前
酷波er应助爱喝汤的番茄采纳,获得10
7秒前
疯狂硕士完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
文文尔雅发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
啊哈完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
科研通AI6.2应助kklove采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
马华化完成签到,获得积分0
9秒前
10秒前
小蘑菇应助天热采纳,获得10
11秒前
ssffzb2008完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
源西瓜发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
12秒前
缥缈海雪发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
ryswtte发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
三分之一发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
li发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
潇洒的惋清应助默默采纳,获得10
15秒前
15秒前
15秒前
wrecust完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
安静板栗完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
枫楠完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
聪慧的稀完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
矿泉水完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
HarisonFisher发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
21秒前
21秒前
22秒前
22秒前
orixero应助三分之一采纳,获得10
24秒前
orixero应助orange采纳,获得10
24秒前
24秒前
王霖华发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
晶种分解过程与铝酸钠溶液混合强度关系的探讨 8888
Les Mantodea de Guyane Insecta, Polyneoptera 2000
Leading Academic-Practice Partnerships in Nursing and Healthcare: A Paradigm for Change 800
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
The Sage Handbook of Digital Labour 600
The formation of Australian attitudes towards China, 1918-1941 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6417020
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8236083
关于积分的说明 17494657
捐赠科研通 5469829
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2889699
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1866660
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1703788