Cholinesterase inhibitors for Alzheimer's disease

竞争对手 加兰他明 多奈哌齐 痴呆 医学 胆碱酯酶 塔克林 阿尔茨海默病 安慰剂 乙酰胆碱酯酶 内科学 随机对照试验 疾病 药理学 病理 替代医学 生物化学 化学
作者
Jacqueline Birks
出处
期刊:The Cochrane library [Elsevier]
卷期号:2016 (3) 被引量:1769
标识
DOI:10.1002/14651858.cd005593
摘要

Background ** This review is awaiting update with a new protocol. The methods used for the review were acceptable when the review was published but do not meet contemporary standards, and the review is also considerably out of date. Therefore, readers should note that the review may not represent a reliable basis for decision making. ** Since the introduction of the first cholinesterase inhibitor (ChEI) in 1997, most clinicians and probably most patients would consider the cholinergic drugs, donepezil, galantamine and rivastigmine, to be the first line pharmacotherapy for mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease. The drugs have slightly different pharmacological properties, but they all work by inhibiting the breakdown of acetylcholine, an important neurotransmitter associated with memory, by blocking the enzyme acetylcholinesterase. The most that these drugs could achieve is to modify the clinical manifestations of Alzheimer's disease. Cochrane reviews of each ChEI for Alzheimer's disease have been completed. Objectives To assess the effects of donepezil, galantamine and rivastigmine in people with mild, moderate or severe dementia due to Alzheimer's disease based on evidence summarised in three existing Cochrane Reviews Search methods The Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group's Specialized Register was searched using the terms 'donepezil', 'E2020' , 'Aricept' , galanthamin* galantamin* reminyl, rivastigmine, exelon, "ENA 713" and ENA‐713 on 12 June 2005. This Register contains up‐to‐date records of all major health care databases and many ongoing trial databases. Selection criteria All unconfounded, blinded, randomized trials of at least six months in which treatment with a ChEI at the usual recommended dose was compared with placebo or another ChEI for patients with mild, moderate or severe dementia due to Alzheimer's disease. Data collection and analysis Data were extracted by one reviewer (JSB), pooled where appropriate and possible, and the pooled treatment effects, or the risks and benefits of treatment, estimated. Main results The results of 10 randomized, double blind, placebo controlled trials demonstrate that treatment for 6 months, with donepezil, galantamine or rivastigmine at the recommended dose for people with mild, moderate or severe dementia due to Alzheimer's disease produced improvements in cognitive function, on average ‐2.37 points (95%CI ‐2.73 to ‐2.02, p<0.00001), in the midrange of the 70 point ADAS‐Cog Scale. Study clinicians rated global clinical state more positively in treated patients. Benefits of treatment were also seen on measures of activities of daily living and behaviour. None of these treatment effects are large. The effects are similar for patients with severe dementia, although there is very little evidence, from only two trials. More patients leave ChEI treatment groups, (29%), than leave the placebo groups (18%). There is evidence of more adverse events in total in the patients treated with a ChEI than with placebo. Although many types of adverse event were reported, nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, were significantly more frequent in the ChEI groups than in placebo. There is only one randomized, double blind study in which two ChEIs are compared, donepezil compared with rivastigmine. There is no evidence of a difference between donepezil and rivastigmine for cognitive function, activities of daily living and behavioural disturbance at two years. Fewer patients suffer adverse events on donepezil than rivastigmine. Authors' conclusions The three cholinesterase inhibitors are efficacious for mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease. Despite the slight variations in the mode of action of the three cholinesterase inhibitors there is no evidence of any differences between them with respect to efficacy. The evidence from one large trial shows fewer adverse events associated with donepezil compared with rivastigmine.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
dd发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
师专第一黑奴完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
3秒前
3秒前
0ne222完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
英俊的铭应助陶醉太阳采纳,获得10
4秒前
简简单单发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
隐形曼青应助烂漫如松采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
大胆的迎梅完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
7秒前
7秒前
8秒前
大佑完成签到,获得积分20
8秒前
稳重冰海发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
Hello应助Accept采纳,获得10
9秒前
LMH完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
汽水发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
chen完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
大佑发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
李军发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
12秒前
科研鸟发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
13秒前
机灵柚子应助现代的书本采纳,获得10
13秒前
YellowStar发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
思源应助噔噔噔噔采纳,获得10
14秒前
我是老大应助忠诚卫士采纳,获得10
14秒前
地球战神完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
章鱼大丸子完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
HP完成签到,获得积分20
16秒前
复杂的方盒完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
YellowStar完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
咕噜仔发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
华仔应助简简单单采纳,获得10
18秒前
张张发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
高分求助中
(禁止应助)【重要!!请各位详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Local Grammar Approaches to Speech Act Studies 5000
Plutonium Handbook 4000
International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Madrid Code) (Regnum Vegetabile) 1500
Functional High Entropy Alloys and Compounds 1000
Building Quantum Computers 1000
Robot-supported joining of reinforcement textiles with one-sided sewing heads 900
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4225009
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3758357
关于积分的说明 11813766
捐赠科研通 3419943
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1876979
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 930400
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 838582