亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Adjuvant therapy in biliary tract cancers: oral fluoropyrimidine as a beginning

医学 胆道 胆道癌 卡培他滨 内科学 奥沙利铂 肿瘤科 癌症 胃肠病学 结直肠癌 化疗 吉西他滨
作者
Nai‐Jung Chiang,Li-Tzong Chen
出处
期刊:The Lancet [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:401 (10372): 170-171
标识
DOI:10.1016/s0140-6736(22)02323-6
摘要

Biliary tract cancer is a group of malignant tumours, mostly adenocarcinoma, arising from different sites of the biliary tract with diverse aetiology, molecular profiling, TNM classification, and surgical procedures and outcomes of resectable diseases. 1 Valle JW Kelley RK Nervi B Oh D-Y Zhu AX Biliary tract cancer. Lancet. 2021; 397: 428-444 Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (264) Google Scholar Radical surgical resection remains the only curative treatment, but postoperative relapse is common. 1 Valle JW Kelley RK Nervi B Oh D-Y Zhu AX Biliary tract cancer. Lancet. 2021; 397: 428-444 Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (264) Google Scholar Developing effective adjuvant therapy is mandatory. However, two modern observation-controlled phase 3 trials, the BCAT trial 2 Ebata T Hirano S Konishi M et al. Randomized clinical trial of adjuvant gemcitabine chemotherapy versus observation in resected bile duct cancer. Br J Surg. 2018; 105: 192-202 Crossref PubMed Scopus (224) Google Scholar and the PRODIGE 12-ACCORD 18 trial, 3 Edeline J Benabdelghani M Bertaut A et al. Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin chemotherapy or surveillance in resected biliary tract cancer (PRODIGE 12-ACCORD 18-UNICANCER GI): a randomized phase III study. J Clin Oncol. 2019; 37: 658-667 Crossref PubMed Scopus (278) Google Scholar did not show the benefit of adjuvant gemcitabine-based chemotherapy in resected biliary tract cancers. BILCAP 4 Primrose JN Fox RP Palmer DH et al. Capecitabine compared with observation in resected biliary tract cancer (BILCAP): a randomised, controlled, multicentre, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2019; 20: 663-673 Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (615) Google Scholar was the first phase 3 study to support the role of adjuvant chemotherapy, with oral capecitabine, for resected biliary tract cancers. 5 Shroff RT Kennedy EB Bachini M et al. Adjuvant therapy for resected biliary tract cancer: ASCO clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2019; 37: 1015-1027 Crossref PubMed Scopus (244) Google Scholar , 6 Yoo C Jeong H Kim KP et al. Adjuvant gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GemCis) versus capecitabine (CAP) in patients (pts) with resected lymph node (LN)-positive extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCA): a multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase 2 study (STAMP). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2022; 404019 Google Scholar , 7 Stein A Arnold D Bridgewater J et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin compared to observation after curative intent resection of cholangiocarcinoma and muscle invasive gallbladder carcinoma (ACTICCA-1 trial)—a randomized, multidisciplinary, multinational phase III trial. BMC Cancer. 2015; 15: 564 Crossref PubMed Scopus (146) Google Scholar The recommendation mainly relied on a significant improvement in overall survival by the prespecified sensitivity analysis (hazard ratio [HR]=0·71, 95% CI 0·55–0·92) but not on overall survival (ie, the primary endpoint; HR=0·81, 95% CI 0·63–1·04) in the primary, intention-to-treat analysis, 4 Primrose JN Fox RP Palmer DH et al. Capecitabine compared with observation in resected biliary tract cancer (BILCAP): a randomised, controlled, multicentre, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2019; 20: 663-673 Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (615) Google Scholar and is thus debatable. The adjusted HR for overall survival increased to 0·84 (95% Cl 0·67–1·06) and the HR for recurrence-free survival was 0·81 (95% Cl 0·65–1·01) in the extension report, 8 Bridgewater J Fletcher P Palmer DH et al. Long-term outcomes and exploratory analyses of the randomized phase III BILCAP study. J Clin Oncol. 2022; 40: 2048-2057 Crossref PubMed Scopus (31) Google Scholar which further weakened the recommendation. 9 Edeline J Malka D Capecitabine: still a standard option in the adjuvant setting of biliary tract cancer?. J Clin Oncol. 2022; 40: 3667-3668 Crossref PubMed Scopus (2) Google Scholar Adjuvant S-1 compared with observation in resected biliary tract cancer (JCOG1202, ASCOT): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trialAlthough long-term clinical benefit would be needed for a definitive conclusion, a significant improvement in survival suggested adjuvant S-1 could be considered a standard of care for resected biliary tract cancer in Asian patients. Full-Text PDF

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
2秒前
无花果的应助被郭橐驼采纳,获得10
4秒前
5秒前
zxdzaz完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
14秒前
null关闭了yc的文献求助
16秒前
null关闭了03的文献求助
19秒前
21秒前
24秒前
xf完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
26秒前
27秒前
29秒前
xf发布了新的文献求助10
30秒前
31秒前
33秒前
平常听蓉完成签到,获得积分10
35秒前
36秒前
36秒前
39秒前
无花果的应助被CZR123采纳,获得10
39秒前
40秒前
虚心的手套完成签到,获得积分10
40秒前
郭橐驼发布了新的文献求助10
41秒前
41秒前
44秒前
45秒前
null关闭了YY的文献求助
46秒前
小白发布了新的文献求助10
47秒前
49秒前
月亮旅行记完成签到,获得积分10
49秒前
51秒前
郭橐驼完成签到,获得积分10
52秒前
54秒前
57秒前
彭于晏的应助被郭橐驼采纳,获得10
58秒前
科研通AI6.4的应助被xf采纳,获得10
58秒前
59秒前
1分钟前
1分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Das Matthäusevangelium: Kapitel 1:1–17 1000
IRTSD: Open-Source Data and Toolset for Electromagnetic Transient Analysis of Disturbances and IBR Control Malfunctions in Transmission Systems 1000
Entre Praga y Madrid : los contactos checoslovaco-españoles (1948-1977) 600
Les Mots du discours 600
A Consideration on Use of Material Grades for Hull Structural Members Based on Fracture Toughness(Second Report) 500
AI Disclosure in Annual Reports: Evolution, Determinants, and Capital Market Participants’ Perceptions 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 人工智能 细胞生物学 无机化学 物理化学 数学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 8115277
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9521406
关于积分的说明 21533531
捐赠科研通 7693499
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3413534
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2539837
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2453572