Adjuvant therapy in biliary tract cancers: oral fluoropyrimidine as a beginning

医学 胆道 胆道癌 卡培他滨 内科学 奥沙利铂 肿瘤科 癌症 胃肠病学 结直肠癌 化疗 吉西他滨
作者
Nai‐Jung Chiang,Li-Tzong Chen
出处
期刊:The Lancet [Elsevier]
卷期号:401 (10372): 170-171
标识
DOI:10.1016/s0140-6736(22)02323-6
摘要

Biliary tract cancer is a group of malignant tumours, mostly adenocarcinoma, arising from different sites of the biliary tract with diverse aetiology, molecular profiling, TNM classification, and surgical procedures and outcomes of resectable diseases. 1 Valle JW Kelley RK Nervi B Oh D-Y Zhu AX Biliary tract cancer. Lancet. 2021; 397: 428-444 Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (264) Google Scholar Radical surgical resection remains the only curative treatment, but postoperative relapse is common. 1 Valle JW Kelley RK Nervi B Oh D-Y Zhu AX Biliary tract cancer. Lancet. 2021; 397: 428-444 Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (264) Google Scholar Developing effective adjuvant therapy is mandatory. However, two modern observation-controlled phase 3 trials, the BCAT trial 2 Ebata T Hirano S Konishi M et al. Randomized clinical trial of adjuvant gemcitabine chemotherapy versus observation in resected bile duct cancer. Br J Surg. 2018; 105: 192-202 Crossref PubMed Scopus (224) Google Scholar and the PRODIGE 12-ACCORD 18 trial, 3 Edeline J Benabdelghani M Bertaut A et al. Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin chemotherapy or surveillance in resected biliary tract cancer (PRODIGE 12-ACCORD 18-UNICANCER GI): a randomized phase III study. J Clin Oncol. 2019; 37: 658-667 Crossref PubMed Scopus (278) Google Scholar did not show the benefit of adjuvant gemcitabine-based chemotherapy in resected biliary tract cancers. BILCAP 4 Primrose JN Fox RP Palmer DH et al. Capecitabine compared with observation in resected biliary tract cancer (BILCAP): a randomised, controlled, multicentre, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2019; 20: 663-673 Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (615) Google Scholar was the first phase 3 study to support the role of adjuvant chemotherapy, with oral capecitabine, for resected biliary tract cancers. 5 Shroff RT Kennedy EB Bachini M et al. Adjuvant therapy for resected biliary tract cancer: ASCO clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2019; 37: 1015-1027 Crossref PubMed Scopus (244) Google Scholar , 6 Yoo C Jeong H Kim KP et al. Adjuvant gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GemCis) versus capecitabine (CAP) in patients (pts) with resected lymph node (LN)-positive extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCA): a multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase 2 study (STAMP). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2022; 404019 Google Scholar , 7 Stein A Arnold D Bridgewater J et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin compared to observation after curative intent resection of cholangiocarcinoma and muscle invasive gallbladder carcinoma (ACTICCA-1 trial)—a randomized, multidisciplinary, multinational phase III trial. BMC Cancer. 2015; 15: 564 Crossref PubMed Scopus (146) Google Scholar The recommendation mainly relied on a significant improvement in overall survival by the prespecified sensitivity analysis (hazard ratio [HR]=0·71, 95% CI 0·55–0·92) but not on overall survival (ie, the primary endpoint; HR=0·81, 95% CI 0·63–1·04) in the primary, intention-to-treat analysis, 4 Primrose JN Fox RP Palmer DH et al. Capecitabine compared with observation in resected biliary tract cancer (BILCAP): a randomised, controlled, multicentre, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2019; 20: 663-673 Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (615) Google Scholar and is thus debatable. The adjusted HR for overall survival increased to 0·84 (95% Cl 0·67–1·06) and the HR for recurrence-free survival was 0·81 (95% Cl 0·65–1·01) in the extension report, 8 Bridgewater J Fletcher P Palmer DH et al. Long-term outcomes and exploratory analyses of the randomized phase III BILCAP study. J Clin Oncol. 2022; 40: 2048-2057 Crossref PubMed Scopus (31) Google Scholar which further weakened the recommendation. 9 Edeline J Malka D Capecitabine: still a standard option in the adjuvant setting of biliary tract cancer?. J Clin Oncol. 2022; 40: 3667-3668 Crossref PubMed Scopus (2) Google Scholar Adjuvant S-1 compared with observation in resected biliary tract cancer (JCOG1202, ASCOT): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trialAlthough long-term clinical benefit would be needed for a definitive conclusion, a significant improvement in survival suggested adjuvant S-1 could be considered a standard of care for resected biliary tract cancer in Asian patients. Full-Text PDF
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
大个应助温晴天采纳,获得10
4秒前
CipherSage应助SmoK1ng采纳,获得10
5秒前
8秒前
奋斗奇异果完成签到,获得积分20
10秒前
12秒前
愤怒的觅儿完成签到,获得积分20
12秒前
17秒前
大虫子完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
17秒前
Hammerdai发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
蝈蝈完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
19秒前
研友_nPbeR8完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
852应助Sense采纳,获得10
22秒前
Xxxudi发布了新的文献求助30
23秒前
23秒前
林林林一发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
25秒前
26秒前
30秒前
闪闪的依白完成签到,获得积分20
31秒前
31秒前
赵卫星发布了新的文献求助10
33秒前
33秒前
35秒前
日夜修行完成签到,获得积分10
35秒前
YZC完成签到,获得积分10
35秒前
大模型应助123采纳,获得10
37秒前
38秒前
上官若男应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
38秒前
若水应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
38秒前
丘比特应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
38秒前
852应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
38秒前
汉堡包应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
38秒前
若水应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
38秒前
40秒前
酸化土壤改良应助zph采纳,获得10
42秒前
42秒前
爆米花应助xiewuhua采纳,获得10
44秒前
Autoimmune发布了新的文献求助10
45秒前
高分求助中
One Man Talking: Selected Essays of Shao Xunmei, 1929–1939 1000
Yuwu Song, Biographical Dictionary of the People's Republic of China 700
[Lambert-Eaton syndrome without calcium channel autoantibodies] 520
Sphäroguß als Werkstoff für Behälter zur Beförderung, Zwischen- und Endlagerung radioaktiver Stoffe - Untersuchung zu alternativen Eignungsnachweisen: Zusammenfassender Abschlußbericht 500
少脉山油柑叶的化学成分研究 430
Revolutions 400
Sport in Ancient Times 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 有机化学 工程类 生物化学 纳米技术 物理 内科学 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 电极 光电子学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 2454585
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2126264
关于积分的说明 5415279
捐赠科研通 1854857
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 922505
版权声明 562340
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 493579