峰度
核磁共振
白质
热扩散率
磁共振弥散成像
扩散成像
扩散
化学
核医学
磁共振成像
医学
物理
数学
放射科
统计
热力学
作者
Zhaoqing Li,Chunjing Liang,Qingping He,Thorsten Feiweier,Yi‐Cheng Hsu,Jianhua Li,Ruiliang Bai
摘要
Abstract Purpose Filter‐exchange imaging (FEXI) and diffusion time (t)‐dependent kurtosis imaging (DKI(t)) are two diffusion‐based methods that have been proposed for in vivo measurements of water exchange rates. Few studies have directly compared these methods. We aimed to investigate whether FEXI and DKI(t) yield comparable water exchange measurements in the human brain in vivo. Methods Eight healthy volunteers underwent multiple‐direction FEXI and DKI(t) acquisitions on a 3T scanner. We performed region of interest (ROI) analysis to determine correlations between FEXI‐derived apparent exchange rate (AXR) and DKI(t)‐derived reciprocal of exchange time (). Results In both white matter (WM) and gray matter (GM), DKI(t) revealed substantial diffusion‐time dependence of diffusivity and kurtosis. However, at t ≥ 100 ms, the diffusivity showed weak time dependence. In WM, this time dependence may be due to water exchange between myelin water and “free” water with different T 1 values, although other factors, such as remaining restrictive effects from microstructural barriers, cannot be excluded. We found a significant correlation between DKI(t)‐derived and FEXI‐derived AXR in the axial direction within WM. No such correlation was present in GM, although both values showed similar ranges. Conclusion These results suggest that FEXI and DKI(t) could be sensitive to the same water exchange process only when the diffusion time in DKI(t) is sufficiently long, and only in WM. In both GM and WM, the restrictive effect of microstructure is non‐negligible, especially at short diffusion times (<100 ms).
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI