维持疗法
梅尔法兰
医学
化疗
随机化
养生
内科学
多发性骨髓瘤
随机对照试验
强的松
α-干扰素
α-干扰素
胃肠病学
外科
诱导化疗
化疗方案
肿瘤科
干扰素
免疫学
作者
Konstantinos Zervas,Anastasia Pouli,Vassilios Perifanis,K. Papanastasiou,M. Chatziyianni,C. Mitsouli,Alice Maniatis
标识
DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0609.1996.tb01352.x
摘要
Abstract: Results of studies using IFN‐α treatment for maintaining remission and prolonging survival in multiple myeloma (MM) are in conflict and trials seeking optimum use for this biological response modifier are continuing. Between 1989 and 1993 a prospective randomized multicentre trial was undertaken to evaluate the role of the combination of IFN‐α with chemotherapy (CT) in maintenance treatment of MM. For remission induction, in patients 65 yr or younger, we used VAD (group A) and for the remaining Melphalan and Prednisone (MP) (group B). For maintenance, patients were randomized to receive IFN‐α 3times10 6 i.u. s.c. t.i.w. (group I) or alternating monthly cycles of IFN‐α and CT. The CT cycles were also alternated (VAD, MP, CP) in an effort to prevent the development of multidrug resistance. Median survival of the two maintenance groups from randomization (36 months for group I and 31 months for group II, p=0.3) as well as response duration (13 months in group I and 15 months in group II, p=0.95) were similar. Toxicities were more pronounced both with VAD induction and in the combination maintenance arm. The addition of chemotherapy to the IFN maintenance regimen in MM did not have an advantage over IFN alone.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI