斑秃
医学
专家意见
随机对照试验
德尔菲法
循证医学
皮肤病科
协商一致会议
替代医学
语句(逻辑)
梅德林
家庭医学
外科
病理
内科学
重症监护医学
数学
统计
法学
政治学
作者
Nekma Meah,Dmitri Wall,Katherine York,Bevin Bhoyrul,Laita Bokhari,Daniel Asz Sigall,Wilma F. Bergfeld,Regina C. Betz,Ulrike Blume‐Peytavi,Valerie Callender,Vijaya Chitreddy,Andrea Combalía,George Cotsarelis,Brittany G. Craiglow,Jeff Donovan,Samantha Eisman,Paul Farrant,Jack Green,Ramón Grimalt,Matthew Harries
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jaad.2020.03.004
摘要
Background A systematic review failed to identify any systemic therapy used in alopecia areata (AA) where use is supported by robust evidence from high-quality randomized controlled trials. Objective To produce an international consensus statement on the use and utility of various treatments for AA. Methods Fifty hair experts from 5 continents were invited to participate in a 3-round Delphi process. Agreement of 66% or greater was considered consensus. Results In the first round, consensus was achieved in 22 of 423 (5%) questions. After a face-to-face meeting in round 3, overall, consensus was achieved for only 130 (33%) treatment-specific questions. There was greater consensus for intralesional treatment of AA (19 [68%]) followed by topical treatment (25 [43%]). Consensus was achieved in 45 (36%) questions pertaining to systemic therapies in AA. The categories with the least consensus were phototherapy and nonprescription therapies. Limitations The study included a comprehensive list of systemic treatments for AA but not all treatments used. Conclusion Despite divergent opinions among experts, consensus was achieved on a number of pertinent questions. The concluding statement also highlights areas where expert consensus is lacking and where an international patient registry could enable further research. A systematic review failed to identify any systemic therapy used in alopecia areata (AA) where use is supported by robust evidence from high-quality randomized controlled trials. To produce an international consensus statement on the use and utility of various treatments for AA. Fifty hair experts from 5 continents were invited to participate in a 3-round Delphi process. Agreement of 66% or greater was considered consensus. In the first round, consensus was achieved in 22 of 423 (5%) questions. After a face-to-face meeting in round 3, overall, consensus was achieved for only 130 (33%) treatment-specific questions. There was greater consensus for intralesional treatment of AA (19 [68%]) followed by topical treatment (25 [43%]). Consensus was achieved in 45 (36%) questions pertaining to systemic therapies in AA. The categories with the least consensus were phototherapy and nonprescription therapies. The study included a comprehensive list of systemic treatments for AA but not all treatments used. Despite divergent opinions among experts, consensus was achieved on a number of pertinent questions. The concluding statement also highlights areas where expert consensus is lacking and where an international patient registry could enable further research.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI