Renal Artery Branch Denervation: Evaluation of Lesion Characteristics Using a Thermochromic Liquid Crystal Phantom Model

Background Lately, combined main vessel and branch ablation has been recommended during radiofrequency (RF) renal artery denervation. Utilising a validated renal artery phantom model, we aimed (1) to determine thermal injury extent (lesion depth, width and circumferential coverage) and electrode-tissue interface temperature for branch renal artery ablation, and (2) to compare the extent of thermal injury for branch versus main vessel ablation using the same RF System. Methods We employed a gel based renal artery phantom model simulating variable vessel diameter and flow, which incorporated a temperature sensitive thermochromic-liquid-crystal (TLC) film for assessing RF ablation thermodynamics. Ablations in a branch renal artery model (n = 32) were performed using Symplicity Spyral (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA). Lesion dimensions defined by the 51 °C isotherm, circumferential injury coverage, and electrode-tissue interface temperature were measured for all ablations at 60 seconds. Results Lesion dimensions were 2.13 ± 0.13 mm and 4.13 ± 0.18 mm for depth and width, respectively, involving 23% of the vessel circumference. Maximum electrode-tissue interface temperature was 68.31 ± 2.29 °C. No significant difference in lesion depth between branch and main vessel ablations was found (Δ = 0.02 mm, p = 0.60). However, lesions were wider in the branch (Δ=0.49 mm, p < 0.001) with a larger circumferential coverage compared to main vessel (arc angle of 82.02±3.27° versus 54.90±4.36°, respectively). Conclusions In the phantom model, branch ablations were of similar depth but had larger width and circumferential coverage compared to main vessel ablations. Concerning safety, no overheating at the electrode-tissue interface was observed. Lately, combined main vessel and branch ablation has been recommended during radiofrequency (RF) renal artery denervation. Utilising a validated renal artery phantom model, we aimed (1) to determine thermal injury extent (lesion depth, width and circumferential coverage) and electrode-tissue interface temperature for branch renal artery ablation, and (2) to compare the extent of thermal injury for branch versus main vessel ablation using the same RF System. We employed a gel based renal artery phantom model simulating variable vessel diameter and flow, which incorporated a temperature sensitive thermochromic-liquid-crystal (TLC) film for assessing RF ablation thermodynamics. Ablations in a branch renal artery model (n = 32) were performed using Symplicity Spyral (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA). Lesion dimensions defined by the 51 °C isotherm, circumferential injury coverage, and electrode-tissue interface temperature were measured for all ablations at 60 seconds. Lesion dimensions were 2.13 ± 0.13 mm and 4.13 ± 0.18 mm for depth and width, respectively, involving 23% of the vessel circumference. Maximum electrode-tissue interface temperature was 68.31 ± 2.29 °C. No significant difference in lesion depth between branch and main vessel ablations was found (Δ = 0.02 mm, p = 0.60). However, lesions were wider in the branch (Δ=0.49 mm, p < 0.001) with a larger circumferential coverage compared to main vessel (arc angle of 82.02±3.27° versus 54.90±4.36°, respectively). In the phantom model, branch ablations were of similar depth but had larger width and circumferential coverage compared to main vessel ablations. Concerning safety, no overheating at the electrode-tissue interface was observed.