医学
单中心
阀门更换
外科
股动脉
导管
主动脉瓣
放射科
狭窄
作者
Guangyuan Song,Yanqing Zhao,Guanhua Du,Y Chen,M Y Wang,Siyong Teng,Urko Aguirre,Z Zhou,Guannan Niu,Zhihao Zhao,Zhongyuan Lu,Yihe Wu
出处
期刊:PubMed
日期:2022-06-24
卷期号:50 (6): 563-569
标识
DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20210728-00626
摘要
Objective: To summarize the single center experience of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with a simplified operative protocol. Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent transfemoral TAVR (TF-TAVR) from July 2020 to December 2020 in Fuwai Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. We compared the baseline characteristic, procedure information, 30-day follow-up outcomes of the patients who underwent TF-TAVR without the simplified operative protocol (routine group) or with the simplified operative protocol (simplified protocol group). Results: 93 patients were collected, 42 patients belonging to routine group, 51 patients belonging to simplified protocol group. In simplified protocol group, there were 51 patients planned to use ultrasound-guided femoral access puncture, procedure was successful in all 51 patients (100%). There were 49 patients planned to use the radial artery as the secondary access, procedure was successful in 45 patients (92%). There were 48 patients planned to use the strategy of avoidance of urinary catheter, this strategy was achieved in 35 patients (73%). There were 12 patients planned to use the left ventricular guidewire to pace, procedure was successful in 11 patients (92%). There were no differences in baseline characteristics, major clinical endpoints and 30-day follow-up outcomes between the two groups. Meanwhile, the procedure time ((62.5±17.9)min vs. (78.3±16.7)min, P<0.001), operation room time ((133.7±25.1)min vs. (159.2±42.6)min, P<0.001), X-ray exposure time ((17.2±6.5)min vs. (20.2±7.7)min, P=0.027) were significantly shorten in simplified protocol group compared with the routine group. Conclusion: Our study results indicate that the simplified operative protocol of TF-TAVR is as effective and safe as the routine operative protocol, meanwhile using the simplified operative protocol can significantly increase the operative efficiency of TF-TAVR.目的: 总结经导管主动脉瓣置换(TAVR)术式简化的单中心临床经验。 方法: 2020年10月中国医学科学院阜外医院开始有计划地对经股动脉途径TAVR(TF-TAVR)的术式进行进一步简化,开展超声引导主入路穿刺,桡动脉副入路、无导尿,左心室导丝起搏等策略。本研究回顾性连续收集2020年10月之前3个月(2020年7—9月,常规组)和之后3个月(2020年10—12月,简化组)患者的基线特征、手术相关数据、术后30 d随访结果,并进行比较分析。 结果: 共纳入患者93例,常规组42例,简化组51例。简化组中计划应用超声引导入路穿刺51例,成功应用51例(100%);计划应用桡动脉副入路49例,成功应用45例(92%);计划无导尿48例,最终无导尿35例(73%);计划左心室导丝起搏12例,最终成功应用11例(92%)。两组患者在基线资料、器械成功率、主要终点事件发生率、术后瓣膜功能等方面差异无统计学意义,但简化组的平均手术时间[(62.5±17.9)min 比(78.3±16.7)min,P<0.001]、手术室时间[(133.7±25.1)min 比(159.2±42.6)min,P<0.001]、X线照射时间[(17.2±6.5)min比(20.2±7.7)min,P=0.027]均短于常规组。 结论: 本中心针对TF-TAVR术式的简化方案安全、可行,有效提高了手术效率。.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI