地铁列车时刻表
持续时间(音乐)
患者安全
范式转换
晋升(国际象棋)
医学
病人护理
急症护理
工作(物理)
护理的连续性
医疗急救
心理学
物理疗法
护理部
计算机科学
医疗保健
工程类
政治学
哲学
法学
艺术
文学类
操作系统
认识论
政治
机械工程
作者
Dana Meshkin,Patrick McGillen,Matthew J. Martin,Sigrid Burruss
标识
DOI:10.1177/00031348251341955
摘要
Optimal shift length for acute care surgery remains an ongoing debate that takes into consideration the impact of fatigue on performance, patient outcomes, and provider well-being. The data is conflicting on whether 12- or 24-hour calls are best. Proponents for the 24-hour shift model cite that it fosters superior continuity of care with fewer handoffs, enhances surgical training and does not negatively impact patient outcomes. Supporters of the 12-hour shift model cite enhanced focus, reduced errors, and promotion of patient safety without compromising training requirements or skill acquisition. A thorough look at the practice environment, frequency of calls, and handoff processes are needed to decide on whether a 12- or 24-hour call schedule will be utilized for trainees and attendings.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI