Utstein-style guidelines for uniform reporting of laboratory CPR research.

医学 医疗急救
作者
Ahamed H. Idris,Lena Becker,Joseph P. Ornato,Jane Hedges,Nicholas G. Bircher,Nisha C. Chandra,Richard O. Cummins,Wolfgang Dick,Uwe Ebmeyer,H.E.nry R. Halperin,M.A.ry Fran Hazinski,Richard E. Kerber,Karl B. Kern,P.E.ter Safar,Petter-Andreas Steen,M. Michael Swindle,Joshua E. Tsitlik,Irene von Planta,M.A.rtin von Planta,Robert L. Wears
出处
期刊:Resuscitation [Elsevier]
卷期号:33 (1): 69-84 被引量:242
标识
DOI:10.1016/s0300-9572(96)01055-6
摘要

Both laboratory and clinical investigators contribute to the multidisciplinary knowledge base of resuscitation science. While diversity can be a strength, it can also be a hindrance because of the lack of a common language and poor communication among investigators. Modern cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) research depends on the use of animal models that are designed to simulate cardiac arrest in humans.1 2 Such models are used to explore important new treatments and to refine protocols used in standard interventions, including doses of drugs, chest compression techniques, defibrillation energies, and cerebral resuscitation, before they are applied to humans.3 When favorable results are reported in animal models, the new or refined techniques are often implemented soon afterward in human victims of cardiac arrest. Unfortunately, the results obtained in one laboratory may not be reproducible in another laboratory or in human trials. For example, high-dose epinephrine therapy significantly improves survival in most animal models of cardiac arrest but does not improve survival in humans.4 5 6 7 In addition, some animal studies have documented the efficacy of administering bicarbonate during cardiac arrest, while others have shown it to be ineffective or deleterious.8 Some of these differences are to be expected because an animal simulation is not a perfect model of cardiac arrest in humans. However, it is likely that some of these conflicting results are due to differences in experimental methods and laboratory model design. Variations in study design, such as the quality of chest compressions and ventilation, definitions of variables, or time intervals between an event and the beginning of therapy, are probably responsible for many of the inconsistencies and contradictions reported. The lack of standardization and the use of nonuniform terminology in reports of studies of cardiac arrest in humans have been described as a “Tower of Babel.” …
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
建议保存本图,每天支付宝扫一扫(相册选取)领红包
实时播报
Akim应助mikiyoo采纳,获得10
1秒前
pineapple yang完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
烟花应助羊羊采纳,获得10
2秒前
cindy完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
JAMA兜里揣发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
6秒前
6秒前
YY完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
团子完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
孤独梦凡完成签到,获得积分20
8秒前
小马甲应助机密塔采纳,获得10
9秒前
xx发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
10秒前
AC赵先生完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
11秒前
11秒前
火山完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
Robin完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
14秒前
15秒前
15秒前
活泼冬天完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
孤独梦凡发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
18秒前
XCYIN完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
Robin发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
19秒前
小伙不错完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
干昕慈发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
羊羊发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
小天使的使完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
一只小水母完成签到 ,获得积分10
24秒前
搜集达人应助Robin采纳,获得10
25秒前
友好的天奇完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
温暖囧完成签到 ,获得积分10
29秒前
搜集达人应助nancy采纳,获得10
30秒前
Kyros完成签到 ,获得积分10
32秒前
Wang0102完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Mentoring for Wellbeing in Schools 1200
List of 1,091 Public Pension Profiles by Region 1061
Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams, 2nd Edition 600
Atlas of Liver Pathology: A Pattern-Based Approach 500
A Technologist’s Guide to Performing Sleep Studies 500
EEG in Childhood Epilepsy: Initial Presentation & Long-Term Follow-Up 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 遗传学 催化作用 冶金 量子力学 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5495000
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4592747
关于积分的说明 14438605
捐赠科研通 4525605
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2479542
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1464339
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1437256