Comparative efficacy of tezepelumab to mepolizumab, benralizumab, and dupilumab in eosinophilic asthma: A Bayesian network meta-analysis

美波利祖马布 苯拉唑马布 杜皮鲁玛 医学 恶化 安慰剂 哮喘 内科学 随机对照试验 荟萃分析 嗜酸性粒细胞 病理 替代医学
作者
Tanawin Nopsopon,Grace Lassiter,Mingli Chen,G. Caleb Alexander,Corinne A. Keet,Hwanhee Hong,Ayobami Akenroye
出处
期刊:The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology [Elsevier]
卷期号:151 (3): 747-755 被引量:10
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jaci.2022.11.021
摘要

It is unclear how the efficacy of tezepelumab, approved for the treatment of type 2 high and low asthma, compares to the efficacy of other biologics for type 2-high asthma.We sought to conduct an indirect comparison of tezepelumab to dupilumab, benralizumab, and mepolizumab in the treatment of eosinophilic asthma.The investigators conducted a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analyses. They identified randomized controlled trials indexed in PubMed, Embase, or Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) between January 1, 2000, and August 12, 2022. Outcomes included exacerbation rates, prebronchodilator FEV1, and the Asthma Control Questionnaire.Ten randomized controlled trials (n = 9201) met eligibility. Tezepelumab (relative risk: 0.63; 95% credible interval [CI]: 0.46-0.86) was associated with significantly lower exacerbation rates than benralizumab and larger improvements in FEV1 compared to mepolizumab (mean difference [MD]: 66; 95% CI: -33 to 170) and benralizumab (MD: 62; 95% CI: -22 to 150), though the 95% CI crossed the null value of 0. Mepolizumab improved the Asthma Control Questionnaire score the most, but this improvement was not significantly different from that of tezepelumab (tezepelumab vs mepolizumab; MD: 0.14; 95% CI: -0.10 to 0.38). For efficacy by clinically important thresholds, tezepelumab, mepolizumab, and dupilumab achieved a >99% probability of reducing exacerbation rates by ≥50% compared to placebo, but benralizumab had only a 66% probability of doing so. Tezepelumab and dupilumab had a probability of 1.00 of improving prebronchodilator FEV1 by ≥100 mL above placebo. Compared to mepolizumab, dupilumab had >90% chance for improving FEV1 by ≥50 mL, but none of the differences between biologics exceeded 100 mL.In individuals with eosinophilic asthma, tezepelumab and dupilumab were associated with greater improvements (although below clinical thresholds) in exacerbation rates and lung function than benralizumab or mepolizumab.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
秋雪瑶应助chake采纳,获得10
刚刚
刚刚
1秒前
1秒前
打工肥仔应助旅行的天空采纳,获得10
3秒前
鸢尾松茶完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
ordin发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
所所应助现代期待采纳,获得10
5秒前
suqian完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
6秒前
6秒前
7秒前
rocky15应助dm采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
Ava应助甜甜盼夏采纳,获得10
9秒前
科研狗发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
erich完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
长孙明雪发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
Joe完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
11秒前
高兴小蕊发布了新的文献求助30
12秒前
Aliver arrow发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
15秒前
16秒前
17秒前
李嘉发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
TF邓佳鑫应助高兴可乐采纳,获得10
19秒前
TF邓佳鑫应助高兴可乐采纳,获得10
19秒前
zhanglh发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
21秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助高兴小蕊采纳,获得30
21秒前
21秒前
22秒前
jopaul完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
圣晟胜完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
英姑应助冬天配地瓜采纳,获得10
23秒前
tong发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
上进boy发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
星星发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
高分求助中
Sustainable Land Management: Strategies to Cope with the Marginalisation of Agriculture 1000
Corrosion and Oxygen Control 600
Yaws' Handbook of Antoine coefficients for vapor pressure 500
Python Programming for Linguistics and Digital Humanities: Applications for Text-Focused Fields 500
行動データの計算論モデリング 強化学習モデルを例として 500
Johann Gottlieb Fichte: Die späten wissenschaftlichen Vorlesungen / IV,1: ›Transzendentale Logik I (1812)‹ 400
The role of families in providing long term care to the frail and chronically ill elderly living in the community 380
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 有机化学 工程类 生物化学 纳米技术 物理 内科学 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 电极 光电子学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 2555762
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2179804
关于积分的说明 5621458
捐赠科研通 1901159
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 949631
版权声明 565592
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 504754