Comparative efficacy of tezepelumab to mepolizumab, benralizumab, and dupilumab in eosinophilic asthma: A Bayesian network meta-analysis

美波利祖马布 苯拉唑马布 杜皮鲁玛 医学 哮喘 内科学 荟萃分析 皮肤病科 嗜酸性粒细胞
作者
Tanawin Nopsopon,Grace Lassiter,Ming‐Li Chen,G. Caleb Alexander,Corinne Keet,Hwanhee Hong,Ayobami Akenroye
出处
期刊:The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:151 (3): 747-755 被引量:41
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jaci.2022.11.021
摘要

It is unclear how the efficacy of tezepelumab, approved for the treatment of type 2 high and low asthma, compares to the efficacy of other biologics for type 2-high asthma.We sought to conduct an indirect comparison of tezepelumab to dupilumab, benralizumab, and mepolizumab in the treatment of eosinophilic asthma.The investigators conducted a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analyses. They identified randomized controlled trials indexed in PubMed, Embase, or Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) between January 1, 2000, and August 12, 2022. Outcomes included exacerbation rates, prebronchodilator FEV1, and the Asthma Control Questionnaire.Ten randomized controlled trials (n = 9201) met eligibility. Tezepelumab (relative risk: 0.63; 95% credible interval [CI]: 0.46-0.86) was associated with significantly lower exacerbation rates than benralizumab and larger improvements in FEV1 compared to mepolizumab (mean difference [MD]: 66; 95% CI: -33 to 170) and benralizumab (MD: 62; 95% CI: -22 to 150), though the 95% CI crossed the null value of 0. Mepolizumab improved the Asthma Control Questionnaire score the most, but this improvement was not significantly different from that of tezepelumab (tezepelumab vs mepolizumab; MD: 0.14; 95% CI: -0.10 to 0.38). For efficacy by clinically important thresholds, tezepelumab, mepolizumab, and dupilumab achieved a >99% probability of reducing exacerbation rates by ≥50% compared to placebo, but benralizumab had only a 66% probability of doing so. Tezepelumab and dupilumab had a probability of 1.00 of improving prebronchodilator FEV1 by ≥100 mL above placebo. Compared to mepolizumab, dupilumab had >90% chance for improving FEV1 by ≥50 mL, but none of the differences between biologics exceeded 100 mL.In individuals with eosinophilic asthma, tezepelumab and dupilumab were associated with greater improvements (although below clinical thresholds) in exacerbation rates and lung function than benralizumab or mepolizumab.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
大大杰发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
7秒前
yuanll完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
科研通AI5应助新疆彭于晏采纳,获得10
8秒前
爆米花应助新疆彭于晏采纳,获得10
8秒前
bkagyin应助啦啦啦啦啦采纳,获得10
10秒前
笑点低灵槐完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
13秒前
飞龙在天完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
zhang发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
18秒前
Owen应助西安浴日光能赵炜采纳,获得10
19秒前
谁用的我的名字完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
呼呼发布了新的文献求助20
21秒前
伶俐绿柏完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
cindy发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
25秒前
务实蜻蜓完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
星辰大海应助eurus采纳,获得10
28秒前
30秒前
赘婿应助qiulong采纳,获得10
31秒前
大大杰关注了科研通微信公众号
32秒前
32秒前
小坤同学完成签到,获得积分10
33秒前
啦啦啦啦啦完成签到,获得积分10
34秒前
科研小白关注了科研通微信公众号
35秒前
Zn0103完成签到 ,获得积分10
35秒前
36秒前
小蘑菇应助曾经青槐采纳,获得10
37秒前
诸葛亮晶晶完成签到,获得积分10
37秒前
呼呼发布了新的文献求助10
37秒前
38秒前
38秒前
38秒前
碎碎念s完成签到,获得积分10
38秒前
Liliz完成签到,获得积分10
40秒前
顺利毕业发布了新的文献求助10
42秒前
大个应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
43秒前
Lucas应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
43秒前
斯文败类应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
43秒前
高分求助中
Basic Discrete Mathematics 1000
Technologies supporting mass customization of apparel: A pilot project 600
Introduction to Strong Mixing Conditions Volumes 1-3 500
Tip60 complex regulates eggshell formation and oviposition in the white-backed planthopper, providing effective targets for pest control 400
A Field Guide to the Amphibians and Reptiles of Madagascar - Frank Glaw and Miguel Vences - 3rd Edition 400
China Gadabouts: New Frontiers of Humanitarian Nursing, 1941–51 400
The Healthy Socialist Life in Maoist China, 1949–1980 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3799173
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3344871
关于积分的说明 10321997
捐赠科研通 3061303
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1680191
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 806919
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 763445