医学
胃肠病学
结直肠癌
内科学
炎症性肠病
肿瘤科
疾病
癌症
作者
Anouk M. Wijnands,Bas B. L. Penning de Vries,Maurice Lutgens,Zeinab Bakhshi,Ibrahim Al Bakir,Laurent Beaugerie,Çharles N. Bernstein,Ryan Chang-ho Choi,Nayantara Coelho–Prabhu,Trevor A. Graham,Ailsa Hart,Joren R. ten Hove,Steven H. Itzkowitz,Julien Kirchgesner,Erik Mooiweer,Seth R. Shaffer,Shailja C. Shah,Sjoerd G. Elias,Bas Oldenburg,Adriaan A. van Bodegraven
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.cgh.2024.02.014
摘要
Background & AimsColonoscopic surveillance is recommended in patients with colonic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) given their increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). We aimed to develop and validate a dynamic prediction model for the occurrence of advanced colorectal neoplasia (aCRN, including high-grade dysplasia and CRC) in IBD.MethodsWe pooled data from 6 existing cohort studies from Canada, The Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Patients with IBD and an indication for CRC surveillance were included if they underwent at least 1 follow-up procedure. Exclusion criteria included prior aCRN, prior colectomy, or an unclear indication for surveillance. Predictor variables were selected based on the literature. A dynamic prediction model was developed using a landmarking approach based on Cox proportional hazard modeling. Model performance was assessed with Harrell's concordance-statistic (discrimination) and by calibration curves. Generalizability across surveillance cohorts was evaluated by internal–external cross-validation.ResultsThe surveillance cohorts comprised 3731 patients, enrolled and followed-up in the time period from 1973 to 2021, with a median follow-up period of 5.7 years (26,336 patient-years of follow-up evaluation); 146 individuals were diagnosed with aCRN. The model contained 8 predictors, with a cross-validation median concordance statistic of 0.74 and 0.75 for a 5- and 10-year prediction window, respectively. Calibration plots showed good calibration. Internal–external cross-validation results showed medium discrimination and reasonable to good calibration.ConclusionsThe new prediction model showed good discrimination and calibration, however, generalizability results varied. Future research should focus on formal external validation and relate predicted aCRN risks to surveillance intervals before clinical application.Graphical abstract
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI