术语
医学
生活质量(医疗保健)
缺少数据
随机对照试验
替代医学
临床试验
梅德林
管理科学
医学物理学
质量(理念)
计算机科学
护理部
政治学
外科
病理
工程类
哲学
语言学
机器学习
法学
认识论
作者
Corneel Coens,Madeline Pe,Amylou C. Dueck,Jeff A. Sloan,Ethan Basch,Melanie Calvert,Alicyn Campbell,Charles S. Cleeland,Kim Cocks,Laurence Collette,Nancy Devlin,Lien Dorme,Hans‐Henning Flechtner,Carolyn Gotay,Ingolf Griebsch,Mogens Grøenvold,Madeleine King,Paul G. Kluetz,Michael Koller,Daniel C. Malone
出处
期刊:Lancet Oncology
[Elsevier BV]
日期:2020-01-30
卷期号:21 (2): e83-e96
被引量:241
标识
DOI:10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30790-9
摘要
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs), such as symptoms, function, and other health-related quality-of-life aspects, are increasingly evaluated in cancer randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to provide information about treatment risks, benefits, and tolerability. However, expert opinion and critical review of the literature showed no consensus on optimal methods of PRO analysis in cancer RCTs, hindering interpretation of results. The Setting International Standards in Analyzing Patient-Reported Outcomes and Quality of Life Endpoints Data Consortium was formed to establish PRO analysis recommendations. Four issues were prioritised: developing a taxonomy of research objectives that can be matched with appropriate statistical methods, identifying appropriate statistical methods for PRO analysis, standardising statistical terminology related to missing data, and determining appropriate ways to manage missing data. This Policy Review presents recommendations for PRO analysis developed through critical literature reviews and a structured collaborative process with diverse international stakeholders, which provides a foundation for endorsement; ongoing developments of these recommendations are also discussed.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI