Effect of Diet Liberalization on Bowel Preparation

医学 耐受性 相对风险 荟萃分析 内科学 随机对照试验 置信区间 不利影响 肠道准备 梅德林 胃肠病学 结直肠癌 结肠镜检查 癌症 政治学 法学
作者
Danny J. Avalos,Daniel A. Sussman,Luis F. Lara,Fayez Sarkis,Fernando Castro
出处
期刊:Southern Medical Journal [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:110 (6): 399-407 被引量:20
标识
DOI:10.14423/smj.0000000000000662
摘要

Precolonoscopy dietary regimens often are restricted to clear liquids; however, the superiority of a clear liquid diet (CLD) for bowel preparation quality is ambiguous. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing bowel preparation outcomes between a low-residue diet (LRD) or regular diet (RD) compared with a CLD.MEDLINE, clinicaltrials.gov, Cochrane Central Register, Scopus, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and the Web of Science databases were used to conduct a search for randomized controlled trials from 1976 to March 2015. Of 122 relevant references, 12 studies met our inclusion criteria, 7 studies of which were classified as being of high quality. Pooled estimates of bowel preparation quality were defined as adequate versus inadequate. Secondary outcomes included tolerability, willingness to repeat bowel preparation, adverse events, and adenoma detection rate. Pooled estimates of relative risk (RR) were used for dichotomous variables and standardized mean difference for continuous variables.In the high-quality studies, there were no differences in bowel preparation quality among the LRD/RD and CLD groups (RR 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.93-1.04). Analysis of secondary outcomes included all of the studies. Tolerability (RR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.08) and willingness to repeat favored the liberalized diet arm (RR 1.08, 95% CI 1.01-1.16). There was no significant difference in the adenoma detection rate, whereas hunger was more common in the CLD group.An LRD/RD provided no difference in bowel preparation quality as compared with a CLD. As such, it may be reasonable for patients without risk factors for poor preparation to undergo an LRD until lunch the day before their colonoscopy given that bowel preparation tolerability and willingness to repeat were greater among groups with a liberalized diet.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Nora完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
1秒前
伶俐的悒完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
Agan发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
彭于晏应助lyt采纳,获得10
2秒前
elfff发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
临澈完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
梧桐细雨完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
火花发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
Majiko完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
无情向南发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
王雪发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
Sir.夏季风发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
汉堡包应助Wellbeing采纳,获得10
7秒前
橙子完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
Amy发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
9秒前
qiming发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
joy发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
11秒前
龙龙ff11_发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
香蕉觅云应助直率沂采纳,获得10
11秒前
橙子发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
晴天发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
14秒前
范断秋发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
不安钢铁侠完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
15秒前
辣椒完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
Maestro_S发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
高分求助中
(禁止应助)【重要!!请各位详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Plutonium Handbook 4000
International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Madrid Code) (Regnum Vegetabile) 1500
Functional High Entropy Alloys and Compounds 1000
Building Quantum Computers 1000
Social Epistemology: The Niches for Knowledge and Ignorance 500
Principles of Plasma Discharges and Materials Processing,3rd Edition 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4226360
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3759671
关于积分的说明 11818516
捐赠科研通 3420928
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1877572
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 930810
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 838805