Cost-effectiveness of Laparoscopic vs Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer

医学 胃切除术 随机对照试验 成本效益 质量调整寿命年 临床试验 癌症 腹腔镜检查 普通外科 外科 内科学 风险分析(工程)
作者
Arjen van der Veen,Miriam P. van der Meulen,Maarten F. J. Seesing,Hylke J.F. Brenkman,Leonie Haverkamp,Misha Luyer,Grard A. P. Nieuwenhuijzen,Jan H.M.B. Stoot,Juul J.W. Tegels,Bas P. L. Wijnhoven,Sjoerd M. Lagarde,Wobbe O. de Steur,Henk H. Hartgrink,Ewout A. Kouwenhoven,Eelco B. Wassenaar,Werner A. Draaisma,Suzanne S. Gisbertz,Donald L. van der Peet,Hanneke W.M. van Laarhoven,Geert Frederix
出处
期刊:JAMA Surgery [American Medical Association]
卷期号:158 (2): 120-120 被引量:10
标识
DOI:10.1001/jamasurg.2022.6337
摘要

Laparoscopic gastrectomy is rapidly being adopted worldwide as an alternative to open gastrectomy to treat gastric cancer. However, laparoscopic gastrectomy might be more expensive as a result of longer operating times and more expensive surgical materials. To date, the cost-effectiveness of both procedures has not been prospectively evaluated in a randomized clinical trial.To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic compared with open gastrectomy.In this multicenter randomized clinical trial of patients undergoing total or distal gastrectomy in 10 Dutch tertiary referral centers, cost-effectiveness data were collected alongside a multicenter randomized clinical trial on laparoscopic vs open gastrectomy for resectable gastric adenocarcinoma (cT1-4aN0-3bM0). A modified societal perspective and 1-year time horizon were used. Costs were calculated on the individual patient level by using hospital registry data and medical consumption and productivity loss questionnaires. The unit costs of laparoscopic and open gastrectomy were calculated bottom-up. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were calculated with the EuroQol 5-dimension questionnaire, in which a value of 0 indicates death and 1 indicates perfect health. Missing questionnaire data were imputed with multiple imputation. Bootstrapping was performed to estimate the uncertainty surrounding the cost-effectiveness. The study was conducted from March 17, 2015, to August 20, 2018. Data analyses were performed between September 1, 2020, and November 17, 2021.Laparoscopic vs open gastrectomy.Evaluations in this cost-effectiveness analysis included total costs and QALYs.Between 2015 and 2018, 227 patients were included. Mean (SD) age was 67.5 (11.7) years, and 140 were male (61.7%). Unit costs for initial surgery were calculated to be €8124 (US $8087) for laparoscopic total gastrectomy, €7353 (US $7320) for laparoscopic distal gastrectomy, €6584 (US $6554) for open total gastrectomy, and €5893 (US $5866) for open distal gastrectomy. Mean total costs after 1-year follow-up were €26 084 (US $25 965) in the laparoscopic group and €25 332 (US $25 216) in the open group (difference, €752 [US $749; 3.0%]). Mean (SD) QALY contributions during 1 year were 0.665 (0.298) in the laparoscopic group and 0.686 (0.288) in the open group (difference, -0.021). Bootstrapping showed that these differences between treatment groups were relatively small compared with the uncertainty of the analysis.Although the laparoscopic gastrectomy itself was more expensive, after 1-year follow-up, results suggest that differences in both total costs and effectiveness were limited between laparoscopic and open gastrectomy. These results support centers' choosing, based on their own preference, whether to (de)implement laparoscopic gastrectomy as an alternative to open gastrectomy.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
XXXX完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
白露完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
与离完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
wawaeryu完成签到,获得积分0
4秒前
犹豫的夜完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
lalala发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
里昂义务发布了新的文献求助30
10秒前
孙淳完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
朱哥永正完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
jeery完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
里昂义务完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
lyyy发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
乞明完成签到 ,获得积分10
27秒前
郑大钱完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
清脆亦巧发布了新的文献求助10
28秒前
asdfqwer完成签到,获得积分0
32秒前
追寻又柔完成签到 ,获得积分10
32秒前
Mae完成签到 ,获得积分10
32秒前
原子超人完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
机灵的以筠完成签到 ,获得积分10
33秒前
WZH完成签到 ,获得积分10
36秒前
乐观的眼睛完成签到,获得积分10
40秒前
梁平完成签到 ,获得积分10
40秒前
大鹅莓烦恼完成签到,获得积分10
40秒前
青青完成签到,获得积分10
42秒前
AI完成签到 ,获得积分10
46秒前
範範完成签到,获得积分10
48秒前
YaHaa完成签到,获得积分10
49秒前
猪猪hero完成签到,获得积分10
50秒前
李庆完成签到,获得积分10
52秒前
欣慰煎饼完成签到 ,获得积分20
54秒前
安雯完成签到 ,获得积分10
55秒前
zzz小秦完成签到 ,获得积分10
55秒前
梓树发布了新的文献求助10
58秒前
积极的中蓝完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
微笑的烨霖完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
dochx完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
11完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Development Across Adulthood 800
Chemistry and Physics of Carbon Volume 18 800
The Organometallic Chemistry of the Transition Metals 800
The formation of Australian attitudes towards China, 1918-1941 640
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
天津市智库成果选编 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6444828
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8258640
关于积分的说明 17591778
捐赠科研通 5504542
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2901588
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1878538
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1718137