已入深夜,您辛苦了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!祝你早点完成任务,早点休息,好梦!

Cost-effectiveness of Laparoscopic vs Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer

医学 胃切除术 随机对照试验 成本效益 质量调整寿命年 临床试验 癌症 腹腔镜检查 普通外科 外科 内科学 风险分析(工程)
作者
Arjen van der Veen,Miriam P. van der Meulen,Maarten F. J. Seesing,Hylke J.F. Brenkman,Leonie Haverkamp,Misha Luyer,Grard A. P. Nieuwenhuijzen,Jan H.M.B. Stoot,Juul J.W. Tegels,Bas P. L. Wijnhoven,Sjoerd M. Lagarde,Wobbe O. de Steur,Henk H. Hartgrink,Ewout A. Kouwenhoven,Eelco B. Wassenaar,Werner A. Draaisma,Suzanne S. Gisbertz,Donald L. van der Peet,Hanneke W.M. van Laarhoven,Geert Frederix
出处
期刊:JAMA Surgery [American Medical Association]
卷期号:158 (2): 120-120 被引量:10
标识
DOI:10.1001/jamasurg.2022.6337
摘要

Laparoscopic gastrectomy is rapidly being adopted worldwide as an alternative to open gastrectomy to treat gastric cancer. However, laparoscopic gastrectomy might be more expensive as a result of longer operating times and more expensive surgical materials. To date, the cost-effectiveness of both procedures has not been prospectively evaluated in a randomized clinical trial.To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic compared with open gastrectomy.In this multicenter randomized clinical trial of patients undergoing total or distal gastrectomy in 10 Dutch tertiary referral centers, cost-effectiveness data were collected alongside a multicenter randomized clinical trial on laparoscopic vs open gastrectomy for resectable gastric adenocarcinoma (cT1-4aN0-3bM0). A modified societal perspective and 1-year time horizon were used. Costs were calculated on the individual patient level by using hospital registry data and medical consumption and productivity loss questionnaires. The unit costs of laparoscopic and open gastrectomy were calculated bottom-up. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were calculated with the EuroQol 5-dimension questionnaire, in which a value of 0 indicates death and 1 indicates perfect health. Missing questionnaire data were imputed with multiple imputation. Bootstrapping was performed to estimate the uncertainty surrounding the cost-effectiveness. The study was conducted from March 17, 2015, to August 20, 2018. Data analyses were performed between September 1, 2020, and November 17, 2021.Laparoscopic vs open gastrectomy.Evaluations in this cost-effectiveness analysis included total costs and QALYs.Between 2015 and 2018, 227 patients were included. Mean (SD) age was 67.5 (11.7) years, and 140 were male (61.7%). Unit costs for initial surgery were calculated to be €8124 (US $8087) for laparoscopic total gastrectomy, €7353 (US $7320) for laparoscopic distal gastrectomy, €6584 (US $6554) for open total gastrectomy, and €5893 (US $5866) for open distal gastrectomy. Mean total costs after 1-year follow-up were €26 084 (US $25 965) in the laparoscopic group and €25 332 (US $25 216) in the open group (difference, €752 [US $749; 3.0%]). Mean (SD) QALY contributions during 1 year were 0.665 (0.298) in the laparoscopic group and 0.686 (0.288) in the open group (difference, -0.021). Bootstrapping showed that these differences between treatment groups were relatively small compared with the uncertainty of the analysis.Although the laparoscopic gastrectomy itself was more expensive, after 1-year follow-up, results suggest that differences in both total costs and effectiveness were limited between laparoscopic and open gastrectomy. These results support centers' choosing, based on their own preference, whether to (de)implement laparoscopic gastrectomy as an alternative to open gastrectomy.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
热情不正完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
伊力扎提发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
吴逸彪发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
蛋挞完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
ybheart发布了新的文献求助30
6秒前
吕半鬼完成签到,获得积分0
7秒前
不安青牛应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
景严完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
dudu10000发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
14秒前
传奇3应助小郑不睡觉采纳,获得10
14秒前
hellomoon完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
田様应助吴逸彪采纳,获得10
17秒前
111完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
19秒前
hwj524发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
热情不正发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
闪闪小小完成签到 ,获得积分10
22秒前
Wang_JN完成签到 ,获得积分10
22秒前
CK完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
wawa发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
bless完成签到 ,获得积分10
27秒前
拼搏啤酒完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
接好运发布了新的文献求助10
30秒前
沉静的水香完成签到,获得积分10
35秒前
俏皮的老城完成签到 ,获得积分10
36秒前
天玄完成签到,获得积分10
40秒前
祁问儿完成签到 ,获得积分10
41秒前
陈欣瑶完成签到 ,获得积分10
41秒前
道松先生发布了新的文献求助10
43秒前
康康完成签到 ,获得积分10
44秒前
44秒前
肃肃其羽完成签到 ,获得积分10
44秒前
吴逸彪发布了新的文献求助10
48秒前
50秒前
51秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各位详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Voyage au bout de la révolution: de Pékin à Sochaux 700
ICDD求助cif文件 500
First Farmers: The Origins of Agricultural Societies, 2nd Edition 500
Assessment of adverse effects of Alzheimer's disease medications: Analysis of notifications to Regional Pharmacovigilance Centers in Northwest France 400
The Secrets of Successful Product Launches 300
The Rise & Fall of Classical Legal Thought 260
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4341457
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3849533
关于积分的说明 12020121
捐赠科研通 3490860
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1915693
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 958812
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 858889