Cost-effectiveness of Laparoscopic vs Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer

医学 胃切除术 随机对照试验 成本效益 质量调整寿命年 临床试验 癌症 腹腔镜检查 普通外科 外科 内科学 风险分析(工程)
作者
Arjen van der Veen,Miriam P. van der Meulen,Maarten F. J. Seesing,Hylke J.F. Brenkman,Leonie Haverkamp,Misha Luyer,Grard A. P. Nieuwenhuijzen,Jan H.M.B. Stoot,Juul J.W. Tegels,Bas P. L. Wijnhoven,Sjoerd M. Lagarde,Wobbe O. de Steur,Henk H. Hartgrink,Ewout A. Kouwenhoven,Eelco B. Wassenaar,Werner A. Draaisma,Suzanne S. Gisbertz,Donald L. van der Peet,Hanneke W.M. van Laarhoven,Geert Frederix
出处
期刊:JAMA Surgery [American Medical Association]
卷期号:158 (2): 120-120 被引量:10
标识
DOI:10.1001/jamasurg.2022.6337
摘要

Laparoscopic gastrectomy is rapidly being adopted worldwide as an alternative to open gastrectomy to treat gastric cancer. However, laparoscopic gastrectomy might be more expensive as a result of longer operating times and more expensive surgical materials. To date, the cost-effectiveness of both procedures has not been prospectively evaluated in a randomized clinical trial.To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic compared with open gastrectomy.In this multicenter randomized clinical trial of patients undergoing total or distal gastrectomy in 10 Dutch tertiary referral centers, cost-effectiveness data were collected alongside a multicenter randomized clinical trial on laparoscopic vs open gastrectomy for resectable gastric adenocarcinoma (cT1-4aN0-3bM0). A modified societal perspective and 1-year time horizon were used. Costs were calculated on the individual patient level by using hospital registry data and medical consumption and productivity loss questionnaires. The unit costs of laparoscopic and open gastrectomy were calculated bottom-up. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were calculated with the EuroQol 5-dimension questionnaire, in which a value of 0 indicates death and 1 indicates perfect health. Missing questionnaire data were imputed with multiple imputation. Bootstrapping was performed to estimate the uncertainty surrounding the cost-effectiveness. The study was conducted from March 17, 2015, to August 20, 2018. Data analyses were performed between September 1, 2020, and November 17, 2021.Laparoscopic vs open gastrectomy.Evaluations in this cost-effectiveness analysis included total costs and QALYs.Between 2015 and 2018, 227 patients were included. Mean (SD) age was 67.5 (11.7) years, and 140 were male (61.7%). Unit costs for initial surgery were calculated to be €8124 (US $8087) for laparoscopic total gastrectomy, €7353 (US $7320) for laparoscopic distal gastrectomy, €6584 (US $6554) for open total gastrectomy, and €5893 (US $5866) for open distal gastrectomy. Mean total costs after 1-year follow-up were €26 084 (US $25 965) in the laparoscopic group and €25 332 (US $25 216) in the open group (difference, €752 [US $749; 3.0%]). Mean (SD) QALY contributions during 1 year were 0.665 (0.298) in the laparoscopic group and 0.686 (0.288) in the open group (difference, -0.021). Bootstrapping showed that these differences between treatment groups were relatively small compared with the uncertainty of the analysis.Although the laparoscopic gastrectomy itself was more expensive, after 1-year follow-up, results suggest that differences in both total costs and effectiveness were limited between laparoscopic and open gastrectomy. These results support centers' choosing, based on their own preference, whether to (de)implement laparoscopic gastrectomy as an alternative to open gastrectomy.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
SciGPT应助hu采纳,获得10
刚刚
jomne发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
科研通AI6.4应助szw采纳,获得10
1秒前
yyj完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
追寻的以云完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
fuerfuer发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
4秒前
周周发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
若兰发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
5秒前
5秒前
phy完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
wudizhuzhu233发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
追梦人生完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
赘婿应助yyj采纳,获得10
5秒前
搜集达人应助MiroK采纳,获得10
6秒前
酆不二完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
666完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
小马甲应助鱼儿想游采纳,获得10
7秒前
火星上的西牛完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
鱼叮叮发布了新的文献求助30
8秒前
就是觉得无聊完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
molihuakai应助ji采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
乐观的元霜完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
JamesPei应助虚心的老头采纳,获得10
9秒前
大个应助MCQ采纳,获得10
10秒前
酆不二发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
帅锅锅完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
兀垚完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
11秒前
xixi发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
12秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The Organometallic Chemistry of the Transition Metals 800
Chemistry and Physics of Carbon Volume 18 800
The Organometallic Chemistry of the Transition Metals 800
The formation of Australian attitudes towards China, 1918-1941 640
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
全相对论原子结构与含时波包动力学的理论研究--清华大学 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6442631
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8256562
关于积分的说明 17582478
捐赠科研通 5501197
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2900625
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1877550
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1717279