乳腺癌
生物标志物
肿瘤科
医学
质量(理念)
精密医学
分子生物标志物
癌症
内科学
医学物理学
计算生物学
生物
遗传学
病理
哲学
认识论
作者
Carolin Schmidt,Robert Stöhr,Lora Dimitrova,Matthias W. Beckmann,Matthias Rübner,Peter A. Fasching,Carsten Denkert,Ulrich Lehmann,Claudia Vollbrecht,Florian Haller,Arndt Hartmann,Ramona Erber
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jmoldx.2024.04.003
摘要
Key Points•We organized the first international recurrent external quality assessment (EQA) of PIK3CA mutation testing in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded breast cancer tissue.•In both 2021 and 2022, the EQA success rates ranged between 84.6% and 88.6%.•In summary, 2 years and 1 year after approval of alpelisib by the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency, respectively, international molecular pathology laboratories were already performing well in PIK3CA mutation testing in breast cancer tissue.•EQA feedback will help the participants to improve the quality of their testing approaches.AbstractIn precision oncology, reliable testing of predictive molecular biomarkers is a prerequisite for optimal patient treatment. Interlaboratory comparisons are a crucial tool to verify diagnostic performance and reproducibility of one's approach. Herein is described the design and results of the first recurrent, internationally performed PIK3CA (phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3 kinase catalytic subunit α) breast cancer tissue external quality assessment (EQA), organized by German Quality in Pathology GmbH and started in 2021. After the internal pretesting phase performed by the (lead) panel institutes, in both 2021 and 2022, each EQA test set comprised n = 10 tissue samples of hormone receptor–positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative invasive breast cancer that had to be analyzed and reported by the participants. In 2021, the results were evaluated separately for German-speaking countries (part 1) and international laboratories (part 2). In 2022, the EQA was performed across the European Union. The EQA success rates were 84.6% (n = 11/13), 88.6% (n = 39/44), and 87.9% (n = 29/33) for EQA 2021 part 1, part 2, and EQA 2022, respectively. The most commonly used methods were next-generation sequencing and mutation-/allele-specific qualitative PCR-based assays. In summary, this recurrent PIK3CA EQA proved to be a suitable approach to obtain an international overview of methods used for PIK3CA mutation analysis, to evaluate them qualitatively, and identify the strengths and weaknesses of individual methods.Graphical abstract
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI