失语症
经颅直流电刺激
冲程(发动机)
心理学
听力学
脑刺激
随机对照试验
波士顿命名测验
医学
物理医学与康复
神经科学
刺激
认知
神经心理学
内科学
工程类
机械工程
作者
Leonardo Bonilha,Chris Rorden,Rebecca Roth,Souvik Sen,Mark S. George,Julius Fridriksson
标识
DOI:10.1136/jnnp-2023-331541
摘要
Background Language impairment (aphasia) is a common neurological deficit after strokes. For individuals with chronic aphasia (beyond 6 months after the stroke), language improvements with speech therapy (ST) are often limited. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a promising approach to complement language recovery but interindividual variability in treatment response is common after tDCS, suggesting a possible relationship between tDCS and type of linguistic impairment (aphasia type). Methods This current study is a subgroup analysis of a randomised controlled phase II futility design clinical trial on tDCS in chronic post-stroke aphasia. All participants received ST coupled with tDCS (n=31) vs sham tDCS (n=39). Confrontation naming was tested at baseline, and 1, 4, and 24 weeks post-treatment. Results Broca’s aphasia was associated with maximal adjunctive benefit of tDCS, with an average improvement of 10 additional named items with tDCS+ST compared with ST alone at 4 weeks post-treatment. In comparison, tDCS was not associated with significant benefits for other aphasia types F (1)=4.23, p =0.04. Among participants with Broca’s aphasia, preservation of the perilesional posterior inferior temporal cortex was associated with higher treatment benefit ( R =0.35, p =0.03). Conclusions These results indicate that adjuvant tDCS can enhance ST to treat naming in Broca’s aphasia, and this may guide intervention approaches in future studies.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI