英夫利昔单抗
维多利祖马布
医学
硫唑嘌呤
溃疡性结肠炎
炎症性肠病
他克莫司
甲氨蝶呤
克罗恩病
内科学
胃肠病学
疾病
阿达木单抗
移植
作者
Fernando Magro,Gonçalo Cordeiro,Andreia Martins Dias,María Manuela Estevinho
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.phrs.2020.105075
摘要
Nowadays, non-biological treatments remain valuable approaches among the therapeutic armamentarium of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Mesalamine is the core treatment of mild‑to‑moderate ulcerative colitis (UC) and corticosteroids are crucial for the induction of remission of moderate‑to‑severe flares in both UC and Crohn’s disease (CD). Even approaches as cyclosporine, tacrolimus, azathioprine, methotrexate, and surgery still have a nuclear position as strategies to induce and/or maintain remission in IBD. Due to their particularities and to the accumulated evidence, each of these strategies conquered peculiar roles in the overall IBD strategy, all of them contributing to better outcomes. This review emphasizes the particular roles that non-biological treatments gained over time: recent mesalamine formulations to increase adhesion rates, higher doses of 5-ASA for high-risk patients, MMX technology to improve drug release and attain higher bowel concentrations, cyclosporine as a bridge to vedolizumab, tacrolimus as a potential alternative to thiopurines or infliximab, azathioprine in combination therapy with infliximab and dubious in monotherapy, and surgery as a mean to a “better end”.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI