Long-term survival after volatile or propofol general anesthesia for bladder cancer surgery: a retrospective national registry cohort study

医学 倾向得分匹配 四分位间距 异丙酚 围手术期 膀胱癌 危险系数 回顾性队列研究 外科 前瞻性队列研究 麻醉 队列研究 队列 癌症 内科学 置信区间
作者
Mats Enlund,Hampus Hållberg,Anders Berglund,Amir Sherif,Anna Maria Enlund,Leif Bergkvist
出处
期刊:Anesthesiology [Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
标识
DOI:10.1097/aln.0000000000004969
摘要

Background Prospective interventional trials and retrospective observational analyses provide conflicting evidence regarding the relationship between propofol versus inhaled volatile general anesthesia and long-term survival after cancer surgery. In specific, bladder cancer surgery lacks prospective clinical trial evidence. Methods Data on bladder cancer surgery performed under general anesthesia between 2014 and 2021 from The National Quality Registry for Urinary Tract and Bladder Cancer and the Swedish Perioperative Registry were record-linked. Overall survival was compared between patients receiving propofol or inhaled volatile for anesthesia maintenance. The minimum clinically important difference was defined as a five-percentage point difference in five-year survival. Results Of 7,571 subjects, 4,519 (59.7%) received an inhaled volatile anesthetic and 3,052 (40.3%) received propofol for general anesthesia maintenance. The two groups were quite similar in most respects but differed in ASA physical status and tumor stage. Propensity score matching was used to address treatment bias. Survival did not differ during follow-up (median 45 months [interquartile range, 33 to 62]) in neither the full unmatched cohort, nor following 1:1 propensity score matching (3,052 matched pairs). The Kaplan-Meier adjusted five-year survival rates in the matched cohort were 898/3,052, 67.5% (65.7-69.3) for propofol and 852/3,052, 68.5% (66.7-70.4) for inhaled volatile general anesthesia, respectively (hazard ratio 1.05 [95% CI: 0.96 to 1.15], P = 0.332). A sensitivity analysis restricted to 1,766 propensity score matched pairs of patients who received only one general anesthetic during the study period did not demonstrate a difference in survival; Kaplan-Meier adjusted five-year-survival rates were 521/1,766, 67.1% (64.7-69.7) and 482/1,766, 68.9% (66.5-71.4) for propofol and inhaled volatile general anesthesia, respectively (hazard ratio 1.09 [95% CI: 0.97 to 1.23], P = 0.139). Conclusions Among patients undergoing bladder cancer surgery under general anesthesia, there was no statistically significant difference in long-term overall survival associated with the choice of propofol or an inhaled volatile maintenance.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
移动马桶完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
小尾巴完成签到 ,获得积分20
3秒前
5秒前
小小枫叶轻轻而过完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
我爱科研发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
10秒前
weiwei完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
lpylll发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
13秒前
maox1aoxin应助初晴采纳,获得30
14秒前
15秒前
time完成签到,获得积分20
17秒前
个性凡儿完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
19秒前
小林发布了新的文献求助20
19秒前
20秒前
22秒前
玩命的若菱完成签到 ,获得积分20
25秒前
KK发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
time发布了新的文献求助30
27秒前
缓慢的画板关注了科研通微信公众号
27秒前
28秒前
28秒前
31秒前
HUMBLE发布了新的文献求助10
31秒前
夏峰完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
东篱关注了科研通微信公众号
32秒前
34秒前
Deila完成签到 ,获得积分10
35秒前
三石盟约完成签到,获得积分10
36秒前
小鬼星云完成签到,获得积分20
37秒前
大方访文发布了新的文献求助10
40秒前
42秒前
玩命的若菱关注了科研通微信公众号
43秒前
lpylll完成签到,获得积分10
44秒前
刻苦鼠标完成签到,获得积分10
45秒前
123完成签到,获得积分10
46秒前
Owen应助blue2021采纳,获得30
47秒前
47秒前
高分求助中
Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 4 Volume Set (ASM Books) 13th Edition 1000
Teaching Social and Emotional Learning in Physical Education 900
Boris Pesce - Gli impiegati della Fiat dal 1955 al 1999 un percorso nella memoria 500
Chinese-English Translation Lexicon Version 3.0 500
Recherches Ethnographiques sue les Yao dans la Chine du Sud 500
Two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis reveals causal relationships between blood lipids and venous thromboembolism 500
[Lambert-Eaton syndrome without calcium channel autoantibodies] 460
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 有机化学 工程类 生物化学 纳米技术 物理 内科学 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 电极 光电子学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 2397738
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2099232
关于积分的说明 5291667
捐赠科研通 1827062
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 910748
版权声明 560027
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 486773