亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Prospective Prescription Review System Promotes Safe Use of Analgesics, Improves Clinical Outcomes, and Saves Medical Costs in Surgical Patients: Insights from Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital

医学 药方 前瞻性队列研究 曲马多 急诊医学 不利影响 内科学 止痛药 麻醉 药理学
作者
Han Xie,Haixia Zhang,Jie Peng,Li Li,Yuyu Geng,Weihong Ge
出处
期刊:Advances in Therapy [Adis, Springer Healthcare]
卷期号:39 (1): 441-454 被引量:7
标识
DOI:10.1007/s12325-021-01935-z
摘要

The rate of awareness of prospective prescription review for inpatient prescriptions remains low, and no study has evaluated prospective prescription review systems among hospitalized patients. In this study we evaluate the effect of a prospective prescription review system on the use of analgesics, clinical outcomes, and medical costs in hospitalized patients who underwent surgery. A single-center, real-world study was conducted retrospectively at Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing, China. Patient data were extracted from the medical records, before (June 2016–May 2017) and after (June 2018–May 2019) prescription review system implementation. The primary outcome was proportion of prescriptions of analgesics with potential risks. The secondary outcomes included prescription of opioids or non-opioids, usage of medications to manage analgesics-related adverse events, clinical outcomes, and medical costs. Propensity score matching was used to balance the cohort of patients before and after implementation of the prescription review system. A total of 28,150 inpatients were included for study analysis. After implementation of the prescription review system, the proportion of prescriptions of analgesics with potential risk was significantly reduced (6.3% vs 26.1%, P < 0.05). A significant decrease was observed in the proportion of patients prescribed opioids (24.3% vs 27.5%, P < 0.001) and tramadol (4.7% vs 12.1%, P < 0.001). There was a significant decrease in prescription of antiemetics (21.8% vs 34.1%, P < 0.001) and cathartics (38.4% vs 50.6%, P < 0.001) which were used in the management of opioid-related adverse events. There was a decreased length of stay in hospital [median (Q1, Q3) 10 (6, 17) vs 11 (7, 18), P < 0.01)] with similar readmission rates within 30 days post discharge (1.0% vs 0.8%, P = 0.099). The introduction of the prescription review system was associated with safer prescribing, including a reduction in prescriptions of analgesics with potential risk and necessity of medication to manage analgesics-related adverse events, which resulted in better clinical outcomes and cost saving.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
2秒前
Santas发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
莎akkk发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
28秒前
35秒前
馆长给纯银耳坠y的求助进行了留言
49秒前
53秒前
ming完成签到,获得积分10
56秒前
1分钟前
馆长给HMMXC的求助进行了留言
1分钟前
1分钟前
烈酒一醉方休完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
ming发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
loveei发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
馆长举报xuanxuan求助涉嫌违规
1分钟前
2分钟前
貔貅完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
馆长给勤奋的不斜的求助进行了留言
2分钟前
2分钟前
希望天下0贩的0应助Santas采纳,获得10
2分钟前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助20
2分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
ceeray23发布了新的文献求助20
2分钟前
2分钟前
馆长给优秀的幻波的求助进行了留言
2分钟前
3分钟前
3分钟前
莎akkk发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
sino-ft完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
3分钟前
莎akkk完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
馆长举报cathyfly1006求助涉嫌违规
3分钟前
3分钟前
3分钟前
4分钟前
馆长给哦哦哦的求助进行了留言
4分钟前
4分钟前
4分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
An overview of orchard cover crop management 1000
二维材料在应力作用下的力学行为和层间耦合特性研究 600
Schifanoia : notizie dell'istituto di studi rinascimentali di Ferrara : 66/67, 1/2, 2024 470
Laboratory Animal Technician TRAINING MANUAL WORKBOOK 2012 edtion 400
Efficacy and safety of ciprofol versus propofol in hysteroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis 400
Progress and Regression 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 内科学 生物化学 物理 计算机科学 纳米技术 遗传学 基因 复合材料 化学工程 物理化学 病理 催化作用 免疫学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4834480
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4138311
关于积分的说明 12808254
捐赠科研通 3882071
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2135015
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1155046
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1054277