吸光度
试剂
化学
部分凝血活酶时间
凝血酶原时间
波长
分析物
色谱法
凝血活酶
凝结
医学
材料科学
外科
内科学
光电子学
物理化学
作者
Jonathan Evrard,Romain Siriez,Laure Morimont,Pauline Thémans,Julie Laloy,Céline Bouvy,Damien Gheldof,François Mullier,Jean‐Michel Dogné,Jonathan Douxfils
摘要
Abstract Introduction Clot waveform analysis (CWA), a new methodology to assess coagulation process, can be usefully applied in various clinical settings. However, its clinical use is limited mainly because of the absence of standardization. No consensus exists regarding the wavelengths at which CWA has to be performed what is crucial for the sensitivity of the CWA. Objectives The primary aim of this study is to determine which wavelength is the most sensitive and specific for CWA. Interindividual baseline absorbance will also be assessed as the impact of reagents from the intrinsic, extrinsic, and common coagulation pathway will be determined. Methods Plasma samples were screened at wavelengths from 280 to 700 nm to provide absorbance spectra in clotted and nonclotted plasma. The interindividual variability of baseline absorbance was obtained by screening plasma from 50 healthy individuals at 340, 635, and 671 nm. The inner‐filter effect of reagents was assessed in plasma or serum when appropriate at the same wavelengths. The reagents were those commonly used for activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin time, thrombin time, and dilute Russell's viper venom time. Results Clotted plasma has higher absorbance value than nonclotted plasma ( P < 0.01). The absorbance of all type of samples is higher at 340 nm than at >600 nm ( P < 0.01). The interindividual variability at the different wavelengths was around 25%. However, except with the STA®‐CKPrest® and STA®‐NeoPTimal®, the reagents do not have a significant effect on the baseline absorbance. Conclusions Wavelengths above 650 nm are recommended to perform CWA. Most of the commercialized reagents can be used for CWA.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI