亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整的填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Cognitive and implicit biases in nurses' judgment and decision-making: A scoping review

心理学 认知偏差 梅德林 临床决策 临床判断 应用心理学 认知心理学 认知 社会心理学 医学 精神科 政治学 医学物理学 重症监护医学 法学
作者
Lorraine M. Thirsk,Julia T. Panchuk,Sarah Wall,Reidar Hagtvedt
出处
期刊:International Journal of Nursing Studies [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:133: 104284-104284 被引量:35
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104284
摘要

Cognitive and implicit biases of healthcare providers can lead to adverse events in healthcare and have been identified as a patient safety concern. Most research on the impact of these systematic errors in judgment has been focused on diagnostic decision-making, primarily by physicians. As the largest component of the workforce, nurses make numerous decisions that affect patient outcomes; however, literature on nurses' clinical judgment often overlooks the potential impact of bias on these decisions. The aim of this study was to map the evidence and key concepts related to bias in nurses' judgment and decision-making, including interventions to correct or overcome these biases. We conducted a scoping review using Joanna Briggs methodology. In November 2020 we searched CINAHL, PsychInfo, and PubMed databases to identify relevant literature. Inclusion criteria were primary research about nurses' bias; evidence of a nursing decision or action; and English language. No date or geographic limitations were set. We found 77 items that met the inclusion criteria. Over half of these items were published in the last 12 years. Most research focused on implicit biases related to racial/ethnic identity, obesity, and gender; other articles examined confirmation, attribution, anchoring, and hindsight biases. Some articles examined heuristics and were included if they described the process of, and the problems with, nurse decision-making. Only 5 studies tested interventions to overcome or correct biases. 61 of the studies relied on vignettes, surveys, or recall methods, rather than examining real-world nursing practice. This could be a serious oversight because contextual factors such as cognitive load, which have a significant impact on judgment and decision-making, are not necessarily captured with vignette or survey studies. Furthermore, survey and vignette studies make it difficult to quantify the impact of these biases in the healthcare system. Given the serious effects that bias has on nurses' clinical judgment, and thereby patient outcomes, a concerted, systematic effort to identify and test debiasing strategies in real-world nursing settings is needed. Bias affects nurses' clinical judgment – we need to know how to fix it.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
don完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
豌豆发布了新的文献求助10
31秒前
wanjingwan完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
也曦发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
11发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
11发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
krajicek发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
丰富的瑾瑜完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
flyingpig发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
krajicek完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
我是你爷爷完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
小白菜完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
2分钟前
andrele发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
2分钟前
SCUWJ完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
伍慕儿发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
orixero应助nhh采纳,获得10
2分钟前
伍慕儿完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
2分钟前
nhh发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
bc应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3分钟前
bc应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3分钟前
hongt05完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
3分钟前
3分钟前
惊蛰完成签到,获得积分10
4分钟前
青山完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
ll77完成签到,获得积分10
4分钟前
852应助开朗的凉面采纳,获得10
5分钟前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5分钟前
5分钟前
jyy完成签到,获得积分10
5分钟前
Flex完成签到,获得积分10
6分钟前
高分求助中
Les Mantodea de Guyane Insecta, Polyneoptera 2500
Technologies supporting mass customization of apparel: A pilot project 450
A Field Guide to the Amphibians and Reptiles of Madagascar - Frank Glaw and Miguel Vences - 3rd Edition 400
A China diary: Peking 400
Brain and Heart The Triumphs and Struggles of a Pediatric Neurosurgeon 400
Cybersecurity Blueprint – Transitioning to Tech 400
Mixing the elements of mass customisation 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3784795
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3330055
关于积分的说明 10244162
捐赠科研通 3045395
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1671660
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 800577
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 759483