Impact of Cavitation, High Shear Stress and Air/Liquid Interfaces on Protein Aggregation

The reported impact of shear stress on protein aggregation has been contradictory. At high shear rates, the occurrence of cavitation or entrapment of air is reasonable and their effects possibly misattributed to shear stress. Nine different proteins (α‐lactalbumin, two antibodies, fibroblast growth factor 2, granulocyte colony stimulating factor [GCSF], green fluorescence protein [GFP], hemoglobin, human serum albumin, and lysozyme) are tested for their aggregation behavior on vapor/liquid interfaces generated by cavitation and compared it to the isolated effects of high shear stress and air/liquid interfaces generated by foaming. Cavitation induced the aggregation of GCSF by +68.9%, hemoglobin +4%, and human serum albumin +2.9%, compared to a control, whereas the other proteins do not aggregate. The protein aggregation behaviors of the different proteins at air/liquid interfaces are similar to cavitation, but the effect is more pronounced. Air‐liquid interface induced the aggregation of GCSF by +94.5%, hemoglobin +35.5%, and human serum albumin (HSA) +31.1%. The results indicate that the sensitivity of a certain protein toward cavitation is very similar to air/liquid‐induced aggregation. Hence, hydroxyl radicals cannot be seen as the driving force for protein aggregation when cavitation occurs. Further, high shear rates of up to 10 8 s −1 do not affect any of the tested proteins. Therefore, also within this study generated extremely high isolated shear rates cannot be considered to harm structural integrity when processing proteins.