霸权主义
存在主义
批评
口译(哲学)
哲学
背景(考古学)
认识论
精神分析
文学类
心理学
历史
艺术
语言学
考古
标识
DOI:10.1515/kierke-2024-0011
摘要
Abstract In the 1830s and 1840s, there was a decisive conflict between the Danish followers of Hegel and his opponents. The latter criticized Hegel’s philosophy for being overly abstract and having lost touch with reality. Kierkegaard is given credit for this criticism and for establishing a new philosophical direction that rejects abstraction and focuses on the concrete experience of the individual. The present article argues that there was nothing particularly new about Kierkegaard’s rejection of abstract philosophy and his attempt to emphasize actuality and life. In fact, the conflict was wider and extended to many other Danish thinkers at the time who were critical of precisely this point in Hegel.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI