康复
前交叉韧带重建术
医学
前交叉韧带
回归运动
多学科方法
物理疗法
骨科手术
物理医学与康复
人口统计学的
运动医学
循证医学
梅德林
透视图(图形)
固定(群体遗传学)
患者满意度
生活质量(医疗保健)
模式
前交叉韧带损伤
作者
Anja M. Wackerle,Andrew Sprague,Richard Joreitz,Eric Hamrin Senorski,Stephen J. Rabuck,Bryson P. Lesniak,Eni Halilaj,Jonathan D. Hughes,Volker Musahl,James J. Irrgang,2024 Panther Expert Group
摘要
Strategies for optimal rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) continue to evolve, as the incidence of contralateral ACL injuries and ACL failures varies widely in the literature, highlighting the need for optimising rehabilitation protocols. Early and intermediate rehabilitation build the crucial foundation on which later stages of rehabilitation can successfully be based, ideally leading to satisfactory outcomes and return to preinjury sports performance. However, guidelines for optimal pre- and postoperative rehabilitation management following ACLR remain conflicting, complicating evidence-based decision-making for rehabilitation following ACLR in clinical practice. Furthermore, a standardised rehabilitation protocol, adopted across different institutions, could enable more reliable comparisons of outcomes across studies focusing on surgical aspects, such as graft selection and fixation methods. An international, multidisciplinary group of experts was convened at the 2024 Freddie Fu Panther Sports Medicine Symposium to discuss and debate recent advances and future directions of rehabilitation and return to sport following ACLR. While this part of the series explores the preoperative and early to intermediate phases of rehabilitation, Part 2 highlights the complexity of return to sport and adjunct technologies after ACLR. Early recovery of knee extension, quadriceps function and early focus on movement quality are key components for achieving satisfactory outcomes after ACLR. This summary of key concepts aims to give an overview of recent evidence and current concepts of early and intermediate rehabilitation after ACLR from a multidisciplinary expert perspective and how it needs to be tailored to the individual based on graft type and patient demographics in clinical practice. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, expert opinion.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI