The Inhibition of Glycolysis in T Cells by a Jak Inhibitor Ameliorates the Pathogenesis of Allergic Contact Dermatitis in Mice

Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) and atopic dermatitis develop through delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions mediated by T cells. The development of immunomodulatory drugs, such as Jak inhibitors, would be useful for the long-term management of these diseases owing to their profile of favorable adverse effects. However, the efficacy of Jak inhibitors for ACD treatment has not been fully determined under a variety of settings. Therefore, we evaluated the effects of ruxolitinib, a Jak inhibitor for Jak1 and Jak2, using a mouse ACD model. As a result, the lower numbers of immune cells, including CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, neutrophils, and possibly macrophages, as well as milder pathophysiological aspects have been observed in the inflamed skin of ACD with the administration of ruxolitinib. In addition, the treatment of differentiating T cells with ruxolitinib downregulated the level of IL-2–mediated glycolysis in vitro. Furthermore, symptoms of ACD did not develop in T-cell–specific Pgam1-deficient mice whose T cells had no glycolytic capacity. Taken together, our data suggest that the downregulation of glycolysis in T cells by ruxolitinib could be an important factor in the suppression of ACD development in mice. Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) and atopic dermatitis develop through delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions mediated by T cells. The development of immunomodulatory drugs, such as Jak inhibitors, would be useful for the long-term management of these diseases owing to their profile of favorable adverse effects. However, the efficacy of Jak inhibitors for ACD treatment has not been fully determined under a variety of settings. Therefore, we evaluated the effects of ruxolitinib, a Jak inhibitor for Jak1 and Jak2, using a mouse ACD model. As a result, the lower numbers of immune cells, including CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, neutrophils, and possibly macrophages, as well as milder pathophysiological aspects have been observed in the inflamed skin of ACD with the administration of ruxolitinib. In addition, the treatment of differentiating T cells with ruxolitinib downregulated the level of IL-2–mediated glycolysis in vitro. Furthermore, symptoms of ACD did not develop in T-cell–specific Pgam1-deficient mice whose T cells had no glycolytic capacity. Taken together, our data suggest that the downregulation of glycolysis in T cells by ruxolitinib could be an important factor in the suppression of ACD development in mice.