Evaluation of amide proton transfer imaging for bladder cancer histopathologic features: A comparative study with diffusion- weighted imaging

To assess the ability of amide proton transfer (APT) imaging, in comparison with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), to differentiate low-grade from high-grade bladder tumors and predict the aggressiveness of bladder cancer (BCa).Forty-eight patients diagnosed with BCa confirmed by histopathological findings who underwent magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, including APT imaging and DWI (b = 0, 1000 sec/mm2), were enrolled in this study. The asymmetric magnetization transfer ratio (MTRasym) was defined as the magnetization transfer asymmetry at 3.5 ppm. MTRasym and apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) were compared between the low- and high-grade groups and between non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) in terms of the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs).The MTRasym values were significantly higher in patients with high-grade bladder tumors than in those with low-grade tumors (1.61 % [0.76 %], 1.12 ± 0.3 %; P = 0.000) and in MIBC than in NMIBC (2.53 ± 0.67 %, 1.38 % [0.35 %]; P = 0.000). The AUCs of MTRasym were significantly larger than those of ADC for differentiating MIBC from NMIBC (0.973, 0.771; P = 0.016). Adding APT imaging to DWI significantly improved the diagnostic accuracy for differentiating MIBC from NMIBC versus DWI alone (0.985, 0.876; P = 0.013).APT imaging can predict tumor grade and aggressiveness in BCa. The diagnostic performance of APT imaging in predicting tumor aggressiveness was better than that of DWI, and adding APT imaging to DWI significantly improved the diagnostic accuracy of predicting tumor aggressiveness versus DWI alone.