生物等效性
最大值
医学
药代动力学
药理学
体内
二甲双胍
仿制药
置信区间
生物利用度
立即释放
溶解试验
药品
内科学
生物技术
胰岛素
生物
生物制药分类系统
作者
Ziye Zhou,Chenxiang Wang,Min Li,Lan Qin,Chao Yu,Guoxin Yu,Ying Xia,Huafang Chen,Xiuhua Zhang
摘要
Abstract The objective of the present study was to evaluate the bioequivalence between generic and branded metformin extended‐release (ER) tablets in Chinese subjects. We tested bioequivalence in vitro and in vivo using a comparative dissolution study and a comparative pharmacokinetic trial. Safety assessments were conducted throughout the entire trial period. The dissolution profiles of the generic formulation expressed obvious extended‐release properties, similar to those of the branded formulation ( f 2 > 60.0%). Consistent with the result of the in vitro study, no remarkable differences were found in terms of pharmacokinetic profiles between generic and branded formulations. The 90% confidence intervals of Ln AUC 0‐36 h , Ln AUC 0‐∞ , and Ln C max from generic formulation versus branded formulation were 91.4% to 105.0%, 91.3% to 104.7%, and 101.2% to 119.4%, respectively. During the entire trial period, 4 subjects experienced 11 adverse events. All these were mild and spontaneously resolved. The results obtained from the present study suggest that the generic and branded metformin ER tablets were bioequivalent in Chinese subjects.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI