风味
固相微萃取
油菜籽
化学
芳香
色谱法
食品科学
气相色谱-质谱法
质谱法
作者
Youfeng Zhang,Felix Stöppelmann,Lin Zhu,Jiaqi Liang,Marina Rigling,Xingguo Wang,Qingzhe Jin,Yanyan Zhang
出处
期刊:Food Chemistry
[Elsevier BV]
日期:2023-11-01
卷期号:426: 136617-136617
被引量:7
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.136617
摘要
Rapeseed oil, as one of the three major vegetable oils in the world, its matrix effect makes the decoding flavor a challenge. Solid-phase microextraction (SPME), SPME-Arrow, headspace stir bar sorptive extraction (HSSE), direct thermal desorption (DTD), and solvent-assisted flavor evaporation (SAFE) were compared based on the odorants in hot-pressed rapeseed oil. Besides, methodological validation for 31 aroma standards was conducted to compare reliability and robustness of these approaches. DTD showed the largest proportion of acids, while the other techniques extracted a majority of nitriles. The highest number of odorants was detected by SAFE (31), followed by HSSE (30), SPME-Arrow (30), SPME (24), and DTD (14). SPME-Arrow showed the best performance in linearity, recovery, and reproducibility followed by SPME, HSSE, DTD, and SAFE. Results reveal the advantages and limitations of diverse methodologies and provide valuable insights for the selection of extraction methods in an oil matrix and flavor decoding.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI