The association between type of endocrine therapy and development of estrogen receptor-1 mutation(s) in patients with hormone-sensitive advanced breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized trials

Breast cancer has, due to its high incidence, the highest mortality of cancer in women. The most common molecular type of breast cancer is the luminal subtype, which expresses estrogen and progesterone receptors and is typically treated with surgery and adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET). Estrogen receptor alpha (ERα), encoded by the estrogen receptor-1 (ESR1) gene, is expressed in approximately 70% of all breast cancers, and ET represents a major treatment modality in ERα-positive cancers. However, resistance to different ET evolves frequently, leading to disease progression or recurrence in ER+ breast cancer. Acquired mutations in the Ligand Binding Domain (LBD) of the ERα referred as ESR1 mutations; could be selected by ET itself leading to resistance over the course of ET therapy. The goal of this review is to estimate the effect of Aromatase Inhibitors (AIs), Tamoxifen (TAM) and Fulvestrant (FUL) on the development of ESR1 mutations in hormone-sensitive advanced breast cancer. A systematic review of qualitative studies published between January 1st, 2007 and March 1st, 2019 was conducted using the PubMed and Thomas Reuters Web of Science databases. Search terms included ESR1 mutations, estrogen receptor, breast cancer, recurrent, metastatic disease, aromatase inhibitors, fulvestrant and tamoxifen. Only full-text studies in English concerning the development of ESR1 mutations and their outcomes on disease progression were included. Selection of studies was performed using predefined data fields, taking study quality indicators into consideration. Inclusion criteria of the study populations were: Ghoncheh et al. (2016) [1] female patients above 18 years; Nielsen et al. (2011) [2] Estrogen-receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer in the advanced setting; Reinert et al. (2017) [3] previous exposure to endocrine therapy including SERDs (preferably Fulvestrant), SERMs (preferably Tamoxifen) or Aromatase Inhibitors. The current review enrolled 16 articles, including 4 multicentre double blinded RCTs and 12 cohorts and comprising a total of 2632 patients. The overall incidence rate of the ESR1 mutation was 24% (95% CI: 18%–31%). We observed that D538G was the most frequent ESR1 mutation. Several studies showed that prior endocrine therapy (AIs, TAM, FUL) could result in an ESR1 mutation and therapy resistance leading to disease progression or recurrence. Different mechanisms had been implied to explain the underlying ET resistance. One of the key findings of this work is the significant difference in ESR1 mutation incidence between patients with and without AI therapy (OR: 9.34, 95% CI: 3.28–26.62, P ≤.001). ESR1 mutations are not uncommon phenomenon in patients with hormone-sensitive advanced breast cancer. There is a significant higher incidence rate of ESR1 mutations in patients with previous AI-containing therapeutic regimens, compared to those who received non-AI containing regimes. These ESR1 mutations could lead to the development of complete endocrine resistance to AI, whereas only partial resistance is seen in case of TAM or FUL.