独创性
流利
差异(会计)
质量(理念)
心理学
语言学
灵活性(工程)
精化
自然语言生成
第二语言写作
学术写作
创造力
计算机科学
认知心理学
人工智能
数学教育
认识论
社会心理学
自然语言
第二语言
业务
数学
人文学科
统计
会计
哲学
作者
Scott A. Crossley,Kasia Müldner,Danielle S. McNamara
标识
DOI:10.1177/0741088316650178
摘要
Idea generation is an important component of most major theories of writing. However, few studies have linked idea generation in writing samples to assessments of writing quality or examined links between linguistic features in a text and idea generation. This study uses human ratings of idea generation, such as idea fluency, idea flexibility, idea originality, and idea elaboration, to analyze the extent to which idea generation relates to human judgments of essay quality in a corpus of college student essays. In conjunction with this analysis, linguistic features extracted from the essays are used to develop a predictive model of idea generation to further understand relations between the language features in an essay and the idea generation scores assigned to that essay. The results indicate that essays rated as containing a greater number of ideas that were flexible, original, and elaborated were judged to be of higher quality. Two of these features (elaboration and originality) were significant predictors of essay quality scores in a regression analysis that explained 33% of the variance in human scores. The results also indicate that idea generation is strongly linked to language features in essays. Specifically, the use of unique multiword units, more difficult words, semantic but not lexical similarities between paragraphs, and fewer word repetitions explained 80% of the variance in human scores of idea generation. These results have implications for writing theories and writing practice.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI