回忆录
人格
叙述的
文学类
疏远
历史
特权(计算)
生活写作
奇怪的
政治
艺术
美学
社会学
性别研究
法学
政治学
2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)
医学
疾病
病理
人文学科
传染病(医学专业)
标识
DOI:10.1177/0021989416683543
摘要
This article examines some of the highlights, limitations, and contradictions of Rushdie’s authorial personas that have been perpetuated and challenged by his critics and the mass media. I argue that Joseph Anton, published in 2012, exhibits evidence of Rushdie’s attempt at authorial self-fashioning, and therefore the memoir represents an important part of his effort to shape the public narrative about him. Joseph Anton highlights Rushdie’s exilic persona through direct comparisons to figures like Voltaire and Galileo, and attempts to privilege this position above his other authorial selves. This authorial self has deep roots in a narrative fashioned by Rushdie that has been abetted by some of his critics and the media since the fatwa. My essay critiques this emphasis, suggesting that Rushdie’s self-fashioning is out of step with his twenty-first-century political ideals and affiliations. Ultimately, the third-person “distancing” of the memoir helps to highlight what it seeks to mitigate: a plurality of Rushdie’s competing for public attention.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI