The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Assessment Tool for Performance of Laparoscopic Colectomy

医学 结直肠外科 组内相关 克朗巴赫阿尔法 结肠切除术 可靠性(半导体) 腹腔镜检查 内部一致性 普通外科 外科 物理疗法 患者满意度 结直肠癌 腹部外科 内科学 心理测量学 物理 癌症 功率(物理) 临床心理学 量子力学
作者
Bradley J. Champagne,Scott R. Steele,Samantha Hendren,Paul M. Bakaki,Patricia L. Roberts,Conor P. Delaney,Justin T. Brady,Helen MacRae
出处
期刊:Diseases of The Colon & Rectum [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:60 (7): 738-744 被引量:25
标识
DOI:10.1097/dcr.0000000000000817
摘要

The lack of consensus for performance assessment of laparoscopic colorectal resection is a major impediment to quality improvement.The purpose of this study was to develop and assess the validity of an evaluation tool for laparoscopic colectomy that is feasible for wide implementation.During the pilot phase, a small group of experts modified previous assessment tools by watching videos for laparoscopic right colectomy with the following categories of experience: novice (less than 20 cases), intermediate (50-100 cases), and expert (more than 500 cases). After achieving sufficient reliability (κ > 0.8), a user-friendly tool was validated among a large group of blinded, trained experts.The study was conducted through the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Operative Competency Evaluation Committee.Raters were from the Operative Competency Evaluation Committee of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons.Assessment tool reliability and internal consistency were measured.From October 2014 through February 2015, 4 groups of 5 raters blinded to surgeon skill level evaluated 6 different laparoscopic right colectomy videos (novice = 2, intermediate = 2, expert = 2). The overall Cronbach α was 0.98 (>0.9 = excellent internal consistency). The intraclass correlation for the overall assessment was 0.93 (range, 0.77-0.93) and was >0.74 (excellent) for each step. The average scores (scale, 1-5) for experts were significantly better than those in the intermediate category, with a mean (SD) of 4.51 (0.56) versus 2.94 (0.56; p = 0.003). Videos in the intermediate group scored more favorably than beginner videos for each individual step and overall performance (mean (SD) = 3.00 (0.32) vs 1.78 (0.42); p = 0.006).The study was limited by rater bias to technique and style.The unique and robust methodology in this trial produced an assessment tool that was feasible for raters to use when assessing videotaped laparoscopic right hemicolectomies. The potential applications for this new tool are widespread, including both training and evaluation of competence at the attending level. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A369, http://links.lww.com/DCR/A370, http://links.lww.com/DCR/A371.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
别闹闹发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
syvshc发布了新的文献求助30
1秒前
1秒前
2秒前
冷酷戾发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
稳重书本发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
4秒前
yydragen应助Youngyoung采纳,获得30
5秒前
5秒前
LiYuan完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
桐桐应助七八九采纳,获得10
7秒前
zhangyu应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
7秒前
领导范儿应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
彭于晏应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
7秒前
bkagyin应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
7秒前
8秒前
8秒前
zhangyu应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
汉堡包应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
Theprisoners应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
8秒前
zwk给zwk的求助进行了留言
8秒前
Rondab应助wjx采纳,获得10
9秒前
挑片岛屿完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
情怀应助黄筱妍采纳,获得10
10秒前
搞怪唯雪发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
不懈奋进应助wyx采纳,获得30
11秒前
11秒前
冯冯发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
wqx发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
12秒前
12秒前
可罗雀完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
高分求助中
The Mother of All Tableaux: Order, Equivalence, and Geometry in the Large-scale Structure of Optimality Theory 3000
Social Research Methods (4th Edition) by Maggie Walter (2019) 2390
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
北师大毕业论文 基于可调谐半导体激光吸收光谱技术泄漏气体检测系统的研究 390
Phylogenetic study of the order Polydesmida (Myriapoda: Diplopoda) 370
Robot-supported joining of reinforcement textiles with one-sided sewing heads 360
Atlas of Interventional Pain Management 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4005215
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3545034
关于积分的说明 11292297
捐赠科研通 3281370
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1809662
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 885409
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 810888