AB0883-HPR CHRONIC RHEUMATIC DISEASE MANAGEMENT AND THE SELF-EFFICACY OF RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

医学 类风湿性关节炎 内科学 疾病 物理疗法 风湿性疾病 关节炎 疾病管理 帕金森病
作者
Yanhui Xu,Xiaoling Zhang,C. Chen,Yang Zou,Kunhao Yang,Lei Dai
出处
期刊:Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases [BMJ]
卷期号:80 (Suppl 1): 1465.2-1465
标识
DOI:10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-eular.3785
摘要

Background: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a common chronic disabling autoimmune disease, which cannot be cured completely at present, and patients need long-term medication treatment. The overall management of RA disease and patient self-management is important. Therefore, we built up a chronic rheumatic disease management team, formed by rheumatoid clinicians, clinical nurses and case managers, to provide “integrity continuity” disease management for RA by hospital on-site and WeChat APP. To this end, we used the arthritis self-efficacy scale-8 (ASES-8) to investigate the effect of the chronic disease management with RA. Objectives: To explore the effect of chronic rheumatic disease management and the related factors of self-efficacy of RA patients. Methods: Consecutive outpatients with RA who had been implemented chronic disease management were recruited from January 2019 to January 2020. A questionnaire survey of ASES-8 and clinical data were collected. Results: 1. Among the 376 RA patients who have completed the survey, mean follow-up time of chronic disease management was 29 (8, 41) months, 35.4% patients in CDAI remission stage of disease activity, median ASES-8 score was 59(47,70), and 61.2% patients had medium or above medication adherence. 2. Patients with low ASES-8 had higher RA disease activity (including TJC28, SJC28, Pain VAS, PtGA, PrGA, ESR, CRP), more patients with dysfunction and lower medication adherence than those with high ASES-8 (all P<0.05). 3. Patients were divided into CDAI active RA group and in remission group, and those with low ASES-8 in remission group participated in chronic disease management for fewer months than those with high ASES-8 (median 20 vs. 32, P=0.033), and the HAQ-DI score was higher (P < 0.05). Active RA patients with low ASES-8 had higher disease activity, higher HAQ-DI (median 0.25 vs.0), fewer times of participating in patients’ exchange meeting (median 0 vs.1), lower medication adherence (10.8% vs. 25.9%), and more anxiety or depression (57.6% vs. 31.8%) than those with high ASES-8 (all P < 0.05, Table 1 below). Conclusion: The rheumatic chronic disease management team can help RA patients achieve a higher remission rate by continuous chronic disease management through hospital on-site and the Internet, and can help patients with good self-efficacy and medication adherence. In addition to disease control, we should pay attention to functional limitations and problems of back to work with RA patients in remission, while should pay attention to activity participation, medication adherence and emotional problems with active RA in further practice. Table 1. Comparison of ASES in different RA disease activity Characteristics CDAI remission CDAI active Low ASES (ASES≤59, n =36 ) High ASES (ASES>59, n=97 ) P Low ASES (ASES≤59, n =158 ) High ASES (ASES>59, n=85 ) P Female, n (%) 32 (88.9) 81 (83.5) 0.440 137 (86.7) 74 (87.1) 0.939 Age, yrs,± s 47.4±11.7 46.0±12.5 0.574 49.8±12.9 49.7±12.7 0.933 Disease duration, month, median (IQR) 48 (24,94) 60 (35,96) 0.560 75 (36,120) 72 (36,120) 0.625 Duration of chronic disease management, month, median (IQR) 20 (6,39) 32 (13,41) 0.033 29 (6,41) 29 (5,42) 0.766 Attend patients’ exchange meeting, times, median (IQR) 6 (4,10) 8 (6,13) 0.673 0 (0,2) 1 (0,4) 0.035 Incapable to work, n (%) 11 (30.6) 15 (15.5) 0.051 46 (29.1) 18 (21.2) 0.180 Morisky medication adherence scale 0.857 0.002 Low adherence, n (%) 12 (33.3) 30 (30.9) 78 (49.4) 26 (30.6) Medium adherence, n (%) 15 (41.7) 38 (39.2) 63 (39.9) 37 (43.5) High adherence, n (%) 9 (25.0) 29 (29.9) 17 (10.8) 22 (25.9) 28TJC, median (IQR) 0 (0,0) 0 (0,0) 0.148 3 (1,5) 1 (1,3) 0.003 28SJC, median (IQR) 0 (0,0) 0 (0,0) 0.734 1 (0,3) 1 (0,2) 0.044 PtGA, median (IQR) 0 (0,0) 0 (0,0) 0.302 4 (2,5) 2 (1,3) <0.001 PrGA, median (IQR) 0 (0,0) 0 (0,0) 0.302 4 (2,5) 2 (1,3) <0.001 Pain VAS, median (IQR) 0 (0,0) 0 (0,1) 0.800 3 (2,4) 2 (1,2) <0.001 CRP, (mg/L), median (IQR) 3 (3,3) 3 (3,3) 0.833 3 (3,10) 3 (3,6) 0.422 HAQ-DI, median ( P 5 , P 95 ) 0 (0,0.1625) 0 (0,0.0125) 0.016 0.25 (0,1.25) 0 (0,0.837) <0.001 Anxiety or depression, n (%) 12 (33.3) 24 (24.7) 0.322 91 (57.6) 27 (31.8) <0.001 Disclosure of Interests: None declared

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
CipherSage应助聪明天蓉采纳,获得10
刚刚
刚刚
思源应助健壮书包采纳,获得10
刚刚
菜了完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
wan完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
彼得大帝完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
百里烬言发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
土豆蔡蔡发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
Jasper应助清新的三毒采纳,获得10
2秒前
包凡之完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
天天向上发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
4秒前
4秒前
DT发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
追寻的八宝粥完成签到,获得积分20
4秒前
沉默的涫完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
滴滴完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
李健应助123采纳,获得10
5秒前
纳古菌完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
whwldr关注了科研通微信公众号
6秒前
6秒前
大气乐天发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
Owen应助嗯嗯采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
天天向上完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
赘婿应助文瑄采纳,获得10
8秒前
潇洒友绿完成签到,获得积分20
8秒前
傲娇小懒猪完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
珠珠完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
柒七发布了新的文献求助20
9秒前
传奇3应助Archet采纳,获得10
10秒前
铭仁完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
王王完成签到,获得积分20
10秒前
田様应助优雅冰淇淋采纳,获得10
10秒前
百里烬言完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
wang发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
11秒前
一一发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
高分求助中
Clinical Epidemiology: The Essentials, 6e 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The Graphene Handbook (2019 Edition) 800
Adhesion Science: Principles & Practice 800
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
IEST-RP-CC018: Cleanroom Cleaning and Sanitization: Operating and Monitoring Procedures 600
Fundamentals of Pharmaceutical and Biologics Regulations: A Global Perspective, Second Edition 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6538670
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8330494
关于积分的说明 17849525
捐赠科研通 5642757
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2935591
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1911745
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1771859