医学
前列腺癌
系统回顾
分级(工程)
梅德林
前列腺特异性抗原
科克伦图书馆
随机对照试验
肿瘤科
妇科
内科学
癌症
政治学
工程类
土木工程
法学
作者
Umberto Anceschi,Gabriele Tuderti,Franco Lugnani,Pier Mario Biava,G. Malossini,Lorenzo Luciani,Tommaso Cai,Davide Marsiliani,Alessio Filianoti,Daniele Mattevi,Manuela Costantini,Leonardo Misuraca,Giuseppe Simone
标识
DOI:10.2174/0929867325666180914115416
摘要
In recent years, several biomarkers alternative to standard prostate specific antigen (PSA) for prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis have become available. The aim of this systematic review is to assess the current knowledge about alternative serum and urinary biomarkers for the diagnosis of PCa.A research was conducted in Medline, restricted to English language articles published between December 2014 and June 2018 with the aim to update previously published series on PCa biomarkers. The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) criteria were used for selecting studies with the lowest risk of bias.Emerging role and actual controversies on serum and urine alternative biomarkers to standard PSA for PCa diagnosis, staging and prognosis assessment, such as prostate health index (PHI), PCA3, ConfirmMDx, Aberrant PSA glycosylation, MiPS, miRNAs are critically presented in the current review.Although the use of several biomarkers has been recommended or questioned by different international guidelines, larger prospective randomized studies are still necessary to validate their efficacy in PCa detection, discrimination, prognosis and treatment effectiveness. To date, only PHI and 4Kscore have shown clinical relevance for discriminating more aggressive PCa. Furthermore, a new grading classification based on molecular features relevant for PCa risk-stratification and tailoring treatment is still needed.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI