Studying Past Earthquakes with Modern Techniques: Ground-Motion Simulations for the 11 January 1693 Noto Earthquake in Italy

地质学 地震学 峰值地面加速度 麦卡利强度标度 大地测量学 强地震动 地震模拟 地震小区分带 地震灾害 一致性(知识库) 强度(物理) 震级(天文学) 环境地震烈度表 地震动 几何学 数学 物理 量子力学 天文
作者
Irene Munafò,Aybige Akıncı,Matteo Taroni,Licia Faenza,Ilaria Oliveti,Andrea Antonucci,A. A. Gómez Capera,Andrea Rovida
出处
期刊:Seismological Research Letters [Seismological Society of America]
被引量:4
标识
DOI:10.1785/0220240105
摘要

Abstract The 1693 Noto earthquake, which struck on 11 January, is one of the Italy’s largest and most devastating earthquakes. According to the Italian Parametric Earthquake Catalogue, it reached a maximum intensity of 11 on the Mercalli–Cancani–Sieberg scale and had an estimated magnitude of M 7.3. Nevertheless, its precise location and source definition remain subjects to debate due to the complexity of the seismic sequence and lack of geological evidence. A series of potential seismic sources differing in location, dimension, and kinematics have been proposed in the literature based on seismotectonic data and interpretations. The goal of this work is to perform a retrospective experiment to verify which of the proposed seismic sources have a better fit with the observed intensity data. To do so, novel simulation techniques are used to study this historical earthquake. We generated ground-motion scenarios for each proposed source model through a stochastic finite-fault simulation approach. Then, the simulated ground-motion parameters were converted to intensities using two different ground-motion intensity conversion equations for Italy. Finally, we compared these converted intensities with the observed intensity data in terms of normalized root mean square errors and converted intensities from ground-motion models. Our results generally show good consistency between converted intensities from the simulated and predicted ground motions, whereas the observed intensities fit better to converted ones from the peak ground velocity rather than peak ground acceleration. Our analysis reveals that the source model reproducing the best of the macroseismic data of the Noto earthquake is the Canicattì–Villasmundo fault system with a magnitude of 7.1.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刘刘刘发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
冰魂应助AAAADiao采纳,获得10
5秒前
Xin完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
fl发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
小白完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
斯文败类应助落后月亮采纳,获得10
11秒前
17秒前
19秒前
哎呀完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
科研通AI2S应助时尚的蘑菇采纳,获得10
19秒前
翻译度完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
23秒前
ziyuexu发布了新的文献求助20
23秒前
23秒前
巫马太兰发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
ziyuexu完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
脑洞疼应助RATHER采纳,获得10
30秒前
33秒前
巫马太兰完成签到,获得积分20
38秒前
38秒前
风趣的易真完成签到,获得积分10
39秒前
44秒前
47秒前
今夕是何年完成签到 ,获得积分10
48秒前
RATHER发布了新的文献求助10
53秒前
海盗船长完成签到,获得积分10
53秒前
Hello应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
53秒前
李健应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
54秒前
Lucas应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
54秒前
桐桐应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
54秒前
科研通AI5应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
54秒前
54秒前
科研通AI5应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
54秒前
Owen应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
54秒前
54秒前
科研通AI5应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
54秒前
星辰大海应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
54秒前
小二郎应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
54秒前
小蘑菇应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
54秒前
高分求助中
【此为提示信息,请勿应助】请按要求发布求助,避免被关 20000
ISCN 2024 – An International System for Human Cytogenomic Nomenclature (2024) 3000
Continuum Thermodynamics and Material Modelling 2000
Encyclopedia of Geology (2nd Edition) 2000
105th Edition CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics 1600
Maneuvering of a Damaged Navy Combatant 650
Mindfulness and Character Strengths: A Practitioner's Guide to MBSP 380
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3776514
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3321990
关于积分的说明 10208390
捐赠科研通 3037297
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1666647
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 797596
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 757872