随机森林
全球定位系统
支持向量机
环境科学
中分辨率成像光谱仪
遥感
气候变化
多边形(计算机图形学)
计算机科学
领域(数学)
人工神经网络
地图学
机器学习
人工智能
地理
卫星
数学
生态学
电信
生物
帧(网络)
工程类
航空航天工程
纯数学
作者
Omid Ghorbanzadeh,Khalil Valizadeh Kamran,Thomas Blaschke,Jagannath Aryal,Amin Naboureh,Jamshid Einali,Jinhu Bian
出处
期刊:Fire
[Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute]
日期:2019-07-28
卷期号:2 (3): 43-43
被引量:178
摘要
Recently, global climate change discussions have become more prominent, and forests are considered as the ecosystems most at risk by the consequences of climate change. Wildfires are among one of the main drivers leading to losses in forested areas. The increasing availability of free remotely sensed data has enabled the precise locations of wildfires to be reliably monitored. A wildfire data inventory was created by integrating global positioning system (GPS) polygons with data collected from the moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer (MODIS) thermal anomalies product between 2012 and 2017 for Amol County, northern Iran. The GPS polygon dataset from the state wildlife organization was gathered through extensive field surveys. The integrated inventory dataset, along with sixteen conditioning factors (topographic, meteorological, vegetation, anthropological, and hydrological factors), was used to evaluate the potential of different machine learning (ML) approaches for the spatial prediction of wildfire susceptibility. The applied ML approaches included an artificial neural network (ANN), support vector machines (SVM), and random forest (RF). All ML approaches were trained using 75% of the wildfire inventory dataset and tested using the remaining 25% of the dataset in the four-fold cross-validation (CV) procedure. The CV method is used for dealing with the randomness effects of the training and testing dataset selection on the performance of applied ML approaches. To validate the resulting wildfire susceptibility maps based on three different ML approaches and four different folds of inventory datasets, the true positive and false positive rates were calculated. In the following, the accuracy of each of the twelve resulting maps was assessed through the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve. The resulting CV accuracies were 74%, 79% and 88% for the ANN, SVM and RF, respectively.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI