医学
内科学
冠状动脉粥样硬化
索引(排版)
风险因素
心脏病学
冠心病
计算机科学
万维网
作者
Ki‐Bum Won,Ran Heo,Hyung‐Bok Park,Byoung Kwon Lee,Fay Y. Lin,Martin Hadamitzky,Yong‐Jin Kim,Ji Min Sung,Edoardo Conte,Daniele Andreini,Gianluca Pontone,Matthew J. Budoff,Ilan Gottlieb,Eun Ju Chun,Filippo Cademartiri,Erica Maffei,Hugo Marques,Pedro de Araújo Gonçalves,Jonathon Leipsic,Sang‐Eun Lee
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2021.03.009
摘要
The atherogenic index of plasma (AIP) has been suggested as a marker of plasma atherogenicity. This study aimed to assess the association between AIP and the rapid progression of coronary atherosclerosis using serial coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA).A total of 1488 adults (60.9 ± 9.2 years, 58.9% male) who underwent serial CCTA with a median inter-scan period of 3.4 years were included. AIP was defined as the base 10 logarithm of the ratio of the concentrations of triglyceride to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Rapid plaque progression (RPP) was defined as the change of percentage atheroma volume (PAV) ≥1.0%/year. All participants were divided into three groups based on AIP tertiles.Baseline total PAV (median [interquartile range (IQR)]) (%) (group I [lowest]: 1.91 [0.00, 6.21] vs. group II: 2.82 [0.27, 8.83] vs. group III [highest]: 2.70 [0.41, 7.50]), the annual change of total PAV (median [IQR]) (%/year) (group I: 0.27 [0.00, 0.81] vs. group II: 0.37 [0.04, 1.11] vs. group III: 0.45 [0.06, 1.25]), and the incidence of RPP (group I: 19.7% vs. group II: 27.3% vs. group III: 31.4%) were significantly different among AIP tertiles (all p < 0.05). In multiple logistic regression analysis, the risk of RPP was increased in group III (odds ratio: 1.52, 95% confidence interval: 1.02-2.26; p = 0.042) compared to group I after adjusting for clinical factors and baseline total PAV.Based on serial CCTA findings, AIP is an independent predictive marker for RPP beyond traditional risk factors.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI