医学
狼牙棒
科克伦图书馆
内科学
荟萃分析
糖尿病
随机对照试验
2型糖尿病
疾病
纳入和排除标准
2型糖尿病
不利影响
重症监护医学
心肌梗塞
替代医学
内分泌学
病理
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗
作者
Saixian Shi,Xiaofeng Li,Ye Chen,Jiahao Li,Yan Dai
标识
DOI:10.1111/1753-0407.70044
摘要
ABSTRACT Objective Provide an evidence‐based basis for the selection of cardiovascular benefit drugs in Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). Methods Conduct a comprehensive search of all relevant literature from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Clinical Trials.gov from their establishment until December 13, 2023, and select randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that meet the pre‐established inclusion and exclusion criteria. Use the Cochrane bias risk assessment tool to evaluate the quality of the included literature. Use R 4.3.2 software to conduct network meta‐analysis for drug category comparison. Results A total of 24 large‐scale randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included, including 19 intervention measures, and 172 803 patients participated in the study. The results of the network meta‐analysis show that: GLP1RA (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.81–0.97) and SGLT2i (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.83–0.99) can reduce the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), GLP1RA (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.79–0.97) and SGLT2i (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.81–0.99) reduced the risk of cardiovascular death. SGLT2i (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.62–0.75) reduced the occurrence of hospitalization for heart failure, GLP1RA (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.81–0.97) and SGLT2i (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.80–0.97) reduced the occurrence of all‐cause death. Conclusion In the comparison of new hypoglycemic drug classes, GLP1RA and SGLT2i reduced MACE, cardiovascular mortality and all‐cause mortality in T2DM patients with CVD, with no significant difference in efficacy, and DPP4i was noninferior to placebo. Only GLP1RA reduced the risk of nonfatal stroke, and only SGLT2i reduced the risk of HHF. image
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI