德诺苏马布
生物仿制药
医学
随机对照试验
骨质疏松症
绝经后骨质疏松症
双盲
绝经后妇女
肿瘤科
内科学
替代医学
安慰剂
骨矿物
病理
作者
Thomas V. Paul,Bhavuk Garg,Nitin Kapoor,Vishal Patil,Nilesh Indulal Kachnerkar,Jayashri Shembalkar,Sharad Purohit,Sunil Dat Maheshwari,Surabhi Maheshwari,Awadhesh Kumar Yadav,Joe Joseph Cherian,Anubhav Agrawal,Kaushik Basu,Sujit Kumar Tripathy,Ashish B Pongde,Vijay Goni,Pravin Markade,Abhimanyu Makane,Mangesh Tiwaskar,Kripa Elizabeth Cherian
出处
期刊:PubMed
日期:2025-01-01
卷期号:73 (1): e8-e13
标识
DOI:10.59556/japi.73.0772
摘要
Denosumab, a human monoclonal antibody that exhibits strong affinity and specificity for the receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand (RANK-L), is essential in regulating bone turnover. Its inhibition of RANK-L decreases bone resorption by preventing the development, function, and survival of osteoclasts. The objective of the study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of biosimilar denosumab with the reference product, Prolia (denosumab), in Indian women suffering from postmenopausal osteoporosis. This phase III study was a prospective, active-controlled, randomized, double-blind trial that included postmenopausal women diagnosed with osteoporosis. Participants were randomly allocated in a 2:1 ratio to receive either the biosimilar denosumab (Treatment A) or the reference denosumab (Prolia®; Treatment B). All participants also received daily supplementation of 500 international units (IU) of vitamin D3 and 1000 mg calcium. The primary outcomes measured were the bone mineral density (BMD) percentage change at the lumbar spine and the neck of femur, while the secondary endpoint assessed changes in biomarkers from baseline at months 6 and 12. The lumbar spine BMD percentage change for group A vs group B from baseline to month 6 was 5.69 ± 0.88 (p < 0.0001) vs 5.08 ± 1.19 (p < 0.0001), and at 12 months was 7.26 ± 1.05 (p < 0.0001) vs 7.31 ± 1.40 (p < 0.0001), demonstrating equivalent efficacy. Both treatment groups showed statistically significant improvement in femoral neck BMD at 12 months. No statistically significant difference was noted in the ln-transformed primary pharmacokinetic parameters, including C-max, AUC0-120d, and AUC0-∞. Biosimilar denosumab was comparable to reference denosumab with respect to its efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics, and immunogenicity in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. Thus, biosimilar denosumab is expected to improve the quality of life in osteoporotic patients at affordable prices.